ArticleCureus2024
Knowledge About Basic Life Support Among University Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Basic life support and use of automated external defibrillator by dentists in Greece: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- KAP related to first aid among first-year ethnic minority students: a cross-sectional study using latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasic life support (BLS) is an essential skill set for responding to emergencies like cardiac arrest. However, the level of preparedness and interest in BLS among university students remains underexplored, especially in nonmedical populations.
methodsThis study surveyed 427 University of Beira Interior (UBI) students to assess their knowledge, confidence, and interest in BLS training. A cross-sectional questionnaire was used to gather data on previous BLS exposure, perceived competence, and preferences for further training.
resultsThis study focused on a sample of 427 students from the UBI, where 246 (57.6%) had BLS training (group A), predominantly from health-related courses, while 181 (42.4%) had no such training (group B), primarily from non-health-related courses. The study revealed that students with BLS training had significantly higher confidence and preparedness in recognizing and responding to emergencies, such as performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and using defibrillators, compared to those without training. Despite the overall interest in BLS training, particularly through practical sessions, there remains a disparity in access to such education, particularly among students in non-health-related fields. The findings highlight the need for integrating BLS training into the curriculum, potentially starting at the secondary education level, to ensure widespread competence in life- saving skills across the population.
conclusionsThe study highlights the critical need for integrating BLS training into earlier stages of education to improve preparedness across the population. The findings suggest that widespread, practical, and accessible BLS training could significantly enhance emergency response outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.