Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850175›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Knowledge About Basic Life Support Among University Students.

Rita Cruz, Pedro Lito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rita CruzCritical Care Unit, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisbon, PRT.
Pedro LitoCritical Care Unit, Unidade Local de Saúde da Cova da Beira, Covilhã, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasic life support (BLS) is an essential skill set for responding to emergencies like cardiac arrest. However, the level of preparedness and interest in BLS among university students remains underexplored, especially in nonmedical populations.

methodsThis study surveyed 427 University of Beira Interior (UBI) students to assess their knowledge, confidence, and interest in BLS training. A cross-sectional questionnaire was used to gather data on previous BLS exposure, perceived competence, and preferences for further training.

resultsThis study focused on a sample of 427 students from the UBI, where 246 (57.6%) had BLS training (group A), predominantly from health-related courses, while 181 (42.4%) had no such training (group B), primarily from non-health-related courses. The study revealed that students with BLS training had significantly higher confidence and preparedness in recognizing and responding to emergencies, such as performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and using defibrillators, compared to those without training. Despite the overall interest in BLS training, particularly through practical sessions, there remains a disparity in access to such education, particularly among students in non-health-related fields. The findings highlight the need for integrating BLS training into the curriculum, potentially starting at the secondary education level, to ensure widespread competence in life- saving skills across the population.

conclusionsThe study highlights the critical need for integrating BLS training into earlier stages of education to improve preparedness across the population. The findings suggest that widespread, practical, and accessible BLS training could significantly enhance emergency response outcomes.

Indexed as

adult cardiac arrestautomatic external defibrillatorbasic life support (bls)cardiac arrest outcomeout-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID39850175
PMCPMC11756849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.