ArticleCureus2024
Factors Related to Blood Loss During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe safety and efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery have improved with the development of new equipment and improved surgical techniques. However, it is accompanied by the risk of complications. Intraoperative blood loss is an important factor in the safe conduct of surgery. Therefore, we examined the factors associated with intraoperative blood loss.
methodThe amount of intraoperative bleeding experienced by 518 patients with sinonasal disease who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery under general anaesthesia at our hospital over nine years was tabulated. Thirty-four variables were extracted after analysis of patients' background, sinonasal pathology, and haematology results. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed.
resultsMultivariate analysis revealed significant differences in the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR), Lund-Mackay score, operative time, and initial versus repeat surgery. The degree of change between the 25% and 75% points was significant for the following variables: an increase from 5 to 14 points for the Lund-Mackay score at 73 mL.
conclusionsPreoperative precautionary measures should be implemented in the event of re-operation, expected prolonged operative time, high Lund-Mackay score, and prolonged PT-INR. Intraoperative blood loss in patients with a high Lund-Mackay score requires meticulous attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.