ArticleCureus2024
Incidental Diagnosis of Occult Maternal Malignancy With Routine Noninvasive Prenatal Testing During Pregnancy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable hybrid SMPR-Net-XGBoost framework for automated lupus nephritis detection using medical image analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- NIPT detects occult maternal malignancies via cfDNA aberration profiling: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Current imaging applications, radiomics, and machine learning modalities of CNS demyelinating disorders and its mimickers.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for genetic screening has been adopted globally as an alternative to first-trimester and quad screening due to its high sensitivity and specificity. NIPT involves detecting and processing foreign fetal DNA in maternal circulation to screen for fetal aneuploidy. An incidental consequence of this process is the detection of foreign tumor cell DNA in maternal circulation in otherwise asymptomatic patients. Here, we present two such cases of maternal cancer that were initially suspected with routine NIPT during pregnancy. The first patient had an "atypical finding" on NIPT at 13 weeks, five days gestation. Diagnostic prenatal genetic testing with amniocentesis at 16 weeks gestation showed a normal fetal karyotype. Between 25 and 28 weeks gestation, she developed nonspecific symptoms and was ultimately diagnosed with stage IIIB intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The second patient had a "non-reportable" NIPT at 11 weeks due to insufficient fetal DNA fraction. At 16 weeks gestation, NIPT was repeated and showed an "atypical finding of maternal origin". The patient was enrolled in the National Institute of Health Incidental Detection of Maternal Neoplasia Through Non-Invasive Cell-Free DNA Analysis (NIH IDENTIFY) study. She had a whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that identified an adrenal mass. She was diagnosed with stage III high-grade adrenocortical adenocarcinoma. NIPT is not validated for cancer screening or diagnosis. Although the overall incidence of cancer diagnosed with NIPT in otherwise asymptomatic patients is extremely low, this finding presents unique ethical challenges. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.