Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850155›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Incidental Diagnosis of Occult Maternal Malignancy With Routine Noninvasive Prenatal Testing During Pregnancy.

Eniola R Ibirogba, Erica Macdonald, Michael E Tsimis, Marcos Cordoba, Mili Thakur, Vivian C Romero

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eniola R IbirogbaMaternal Fetal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Erica MacdonaldPrenatal Genetics, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine/Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, USA.
Michael E TsimisMaternal Fetal Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine/Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, USA.
Marcos CordobaMaternal Fetal Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine/Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, USA.
Mili ThakurReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, The Fertility Center, Grand Rapids, USA.
Vivian C RomeroMaternal Fetal Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine/Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for genetic screening has been adopted globally as an alternative to first-trimester and quad screening due to its high sensitivity and specificity. NIPT involves detecting and processing foreign fetal DNA in maternal circulation to screen for fetal aneuploidy. An incidental consequence of this process is the detection of foreign tumor cell DNA in maternal circulation in otherwise asymptomatic patients. Here, we present two such cases of maternal cancer that were initially suspected with routine NIPT during pregnancy. The first patient had an "atypical finding" on NIPT at 13 weeks, five days gestation. Diagnostic prenatal genetic testing with amniocentesis at 16 weeks gestation showed a normal fetal karyotype. Between 25 and 28 weeks gestation, she developed nonspecific symptoms and was ultimately diagnosed with stage IIIB intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The second patient had a "non-reportable" NIPT at 11 weeks due to insufficient fetal DNA fraction. At 16 weeks gestation, NIPT was repeated and showed an "atypical finding of maternal origin". The patient was enrolled in the National Institute of Health Incidental Detection of Maternal Neoplasia Through Non-Invasive Cell-Free DNA Analysis (NIH IDENTIFY) study. She had a whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that identified an adrenal mass. She was diagnosed with stage III high-grade adrenocortical adenocarcinoma. NIPT is not validated for cancer screening or diagnosis. Although the overall incidence of cancer diagnosed with NIPT in otherwise asymptomatic patients is extremely low, this finding presents unique ethical challenges. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended.

Indexed as

cell-free dna (cfdna)noninvasive prenatal testing (nipt)oncofertilitypregnancy in cancerprenatal genetic screening

Identifiers

PMID39850155
PMCPMC11756998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.