Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850072›Full record

ArticleGates open research2025

Automated post-run analysis of arrayed quantitative PCR amplification curves using machine learning.

Ben J Brintz, Darwin J Operario, David Garrett Brown, Shanrui Wu, Lan Wang, Eric R Houpt, Daniel T Leung, Jie Liu, James A Platts-Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ben J BrintzUniversity of Utah Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4695-0290
Darwin J OperarioUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
David Garrett BrownUniversity of Utah Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Shanrui WuQingdao University School of Public Healh, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Lan WangQingdao University School of Public Healh, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Eric R HouptUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Daniel T LeungUniversity of Utah Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jie LiuUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
James A Platts-MillsUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-0418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The TaqMan Array Card (TAC) is an arrayed, high-throughput qPCR platform that can simultaneously detect multiple targets in a single reaction. However, the manual post-run analysis of TAC data is time consuming and subject to interpretation. We sought to automate the post-run analysis of TAC data using machine learning models. Methods: We used 165,214 qPCR amplification curves from two studies to train and test two eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. Previous manual analyses of the amplification curves by experts in qPCR analysis were used as the gold standard. First, a classification model predicted whether amplification occurred or not, and if so, a second model predicted the cycle threshold (Ct) value. We used 5-fold cross-validation to tune the models and assessed performance using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and mean absolute error (MAE). For external validation, we used 1,472 reactions previously analyzed by 17 laboratory scientists as part of an external quality assessment for a multisite study. Results: In internal validation, the classification model achieved an accuracy of 0.996, sensitivity of 0.997, specificity of 0.993, PPV of 0.998, and NPV of 0.991. The Ct prediction model achieved a MAE of 0.590. In external validation, the automated analysis achieved an accuracy of 0.997 and a MAE of 0.611, and the automated analysis was more accurate than manual analyses by 14 of the 17 laboratory scientists. Conclusions: We automated the post-run analysis of highly-arrayed qPCR data using machine learning models with high accuracy in comparison to a manual gold standard. This approach has the potential to save time and improve reproducibility in laboratories using the TAC platform and other high-throughput qPCR approaches.

Indexed as

Machine LearningReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitycycle thresholdmachine learningPCR amplificationqPCR

Identifiers

PMID39850072
PMCPMC11756513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.