ReviewAmerican journal of stem cells2024
Assessment of the level of apoptosis in differentiated pseudo-neuronal cells derived from neural stem cells under the influence of various inducers.
Review in American journal of stem cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in Gene Delivery using Nucleic Acid Loaded Nanoparticles for Region Specific Delivery in Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development and maintenance of the nervous system are governed by a scheduled cell death mechanism known as apoptosis. Very much how neurons survive and function depends on the degree of death in differentiating pseudo-neuronal cells produced from neural stem cells. Different inducers can affect the degree of death in these cells: hormones, medicines, growth factors, and others. Developing inventive therapies for neurodegenerative illnesses depends on a knowledge of how these inducers impact mortality in differentiated pseudo-neuronal cells. Using flow cytometry, Western blotting, and fluorescence microscopy among other techniques, the degree of death in many pseudo-neuronal cells is evaluated. Flow cytometry generates dead cell counts from measurements of cell size, granularity, and DNA content. Whereas fluorescence microscopy visualizes dead cells using fluorescent dyes or antibodies, Western blotting detects caspases and Bcl-2 family proteins. This review attempts to offer a thorough investigation of present studies on death in differentiated pseudo-neuronal cells produced from neural stem cells under the effect of different inducers. Through investigating how these inducers influence death, the review aims to provide information that might direct the next studies and support treatment plans for neurodegenerative diseases. With an eye toward inducers like retinoic acid, selegiline, cytokines, valproic acid, and small compounds, we examined research to evaluate death rates. The findings offer important new perspectives on the molecular processes guiding death in these cells. There is still a complete lack of understanding of how different factors affect the molecular processes that lead to death, so understanding these processes can contribute to new therapeutic approaches to treat neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.