Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39850016›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Development and validation of a model to predict cognitive impairment in traumatic brain injury patients: a prospective observational study.

Xiaofang Yuan, Qingrong Xu, Fengxia Du, Xiaoxia Gao, Jing Guo, Jianan Zhang, Yehuan Wu, Zhongkai Zhou, Youjia Yu, Yi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Early prediction of plastic bronchitis in pediatric patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaofang YuanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Qingrong XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Fengxia DuDepartment of Nursing, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Xiaoxia GaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Jing GuoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Jianan ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Yehuan WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Zhongkai ZhouJiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China.
Youjia YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue worldwide that affects millions of people every year. Cognitive impairment is one of the most common long-term consequences of TBI, seriously affect the quality of life. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for cognitive impairment in TBI patients, with the goal of early identification and support for those at risk of developing cognitive impairment at the time of hospital admission. Methods: The training cohort included 234 TBI patients, all of whom were admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from May 2017 to April 2020. These patients were selected from our previously published studies. Baseline characteristics, medical history, clinical TBI characteristics, treatment details, and vital signs during hospitalization were screened via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression to construct a predictive net risk score. The derived score represents an estimate of the risk of developing cognitive impairment in patients with TBI. A nomogram was constructed, and its accuracy and predictive performance were evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and clinical decision curves. For the validation cohort, data were prospectively collected from TBI patients admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from March 1, 2024 to August 30, 2024, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ (registration number: ChiCTR2400083495). Findings: The training cohort included 234 patients. The mean (standard deviation, SD) age of the patients in the cohort was 47.74 (17.89) years, and 184 patients (78.63%) were men. The validation cohort included 84 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.44 (14.42) years, and 68 patients (80.95%) were men. Among the 48 potential predictors, the following 6 variables were significant independent predictive factors and were included in the net risk score: age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.08, P = 0.00), years of education (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, P = 0.00), pulmonary infection status (OR = 4.64, 95% CI: 1.41-15.27, P = 0.01), epilepsy status (OR = 4.79, 95% CI: 1.09-21.13, P = 0.04), cerebrospinal fluid leakage status (OR = 5.57, 95% CI: 1.08-28.75, P = 0.04), and the Helsinki score (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.28-1.83, P = 0.00). The AUC in the training cohort was 0.90, and the cut-off value was 0.71. The AUC in the validation cohort was 0.87, and the cut-off value was 0.63. The score was translated into an online risk calculator that is freely available to the public (https://yuanxiaofang.shinyapps.io/Predict_cognitive_impairment_in_TBI/). Interpretation: This model for predicting post-TBI cognitive impairment has potential value for facilitating early predictions by clinicians, aiding the early initiation of preventative interventions for cognitive impairment. Funding: This research was supported by Science and Technology Development Plan Project of ChangZhou (CJ20229036); Science and Technology Project of Changzhou Health Commission (QN202113).

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentEarlyPrediction modelTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39850016
PMCPMC11753911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.