Observational studyScience progress
Surgical outcomes of subclavian steal syndrome combined with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the prevalence and risk factors of carotid artery (CA) stenosis among subclavian steal syndrome (SSS) patients and to record their prognoses.
methodsThis observational study was retrospective. From January 2015 to October 2022, 169 patients were diagnosed with SSS. Among them, 51 combined with CA stenosis have surgical indications for both diseases. In this cohort, 24 were treated for subclavian artery (23 endovascular, 1 open), 12 for CA (6 endovascular, 6 open), and 5 for both (1 endovascular, 1 open, 3 hybrid). The primary end point was mortality, and the secondary end points were vessel re-stenosis and other complications. Patients were followed up through outpatient, online, or telephone.
resultsCompared with simple SSS, patients who suffered from both were older (60.51 ± 9.304 versus 66.69 ± 7.921, DISCUSSION: This study observed and analyzed different intervention methods and their prognosis in SSS combined with CA stenosis patients, and due to the limited number of participants, more data support would be needed.
conclusionsThe management of SSS patients combined with CA stenosis is more challenging compared to simple SSS. Our research demonstrated different surgical methods and their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.