ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Genetic differentiation in the MAT-proximal region is not sufficient for suppressing recombination in Podospora anserina.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recombination is advantageous over the long term, as it allows efficient selection and purging deleterious mutations. Nevertheless, recombination suppression has repeatedly evolved in sex- and mating-type chromosomes. The evolutionary causes for recombination suppression and the proximal mechanisms preventing crossing overs are poorly understood. Several hypotheses have recently been suggested based on theoretical models, and in particular that divergence could accumulate neutrally around a sex-determining region and reduce recombination rates, a self-reinforcing process that could foster progressive extension of recombination suppression. We used the ascomycete fungus Podospora anserina for investigating these questions: a 0.8-Mbp region around its mating-type locus is nonrecombining, despite being collinear between the 2 mating types. This fungus is mostly selfing, resulting in highly homozygous individuals, except in the nonrecombining region around the mating-type locus that displays differentiation between mating types. Here, we test the hypothesis that sequence divergence alone is responsible for recombination cessation. We replaced the mat- idiomorph by the sequence of the mat+ idiomorph, to obtain a strain that is sexually compatible with the mat- reference strain and isogenic to this strain in the MAT-proximal region. Crosses showed that recombination was still suppressed in the MAT-proximal region in the mutant strains, indicating that other proximal mechanisms than inversions or mere sequence divergence are responsible for recombination suppression in this fungus. This finding suggests that selective mechanisms likely acted for suppressing recombination, or the spread of epigenetic marks, as the neutral model based on mere nucleotide divergence does not seem to hold in P. anserina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.