Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849658›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Using peer narrative support to promote return to work for cancer survivors: a protocol study of action research.

Wenqian Que, Xiaoyun Hu, Tingting Wu, Haiyin Zhang, Yue Shi, Jingyi Zhao, Xiaoqin Su, Benxin Kuai, Yujie Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenqian Que *School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-5113
Xiaoyun Hu *School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China.
Tingting WuSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Haiyin ZhangNantong Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226006, China.
Yue ShiSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Jingyi ZhaoSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Xiaoqin SuSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Benxin KuaiSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Yujie GuoSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China. jyg@ntu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-7753

Funding

the National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences 21BSH007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChinese cancer survivors are not doing well in returning to work. Peer support, as an external coping resource to help cancer survivors return to work, brings together members of the lay community with similar stressors or problems for mutual support. Peer volunteers have not received systematic training, so inappropriate language in the support process can often cause secondary damage to both the peer and the cancer survivor. High-quality narrative support can help both parties gain positive meaning in communication. Therefore, we draw on narrative-related theoretical techniques to construct a model of peer narrative support to facilitate cancer survivors' return to work.

methodsThis study is a participatory action research, including three phases: (i) Construction: Construct a peer narrative support model through literature review, theoretical research, and expert meetings. A peer narrative competence training program and a peer narrative support implementation program are constructed on this basis. (ii) Intervention: Firstly, two rounds of training actions will be carried out for 8 weeks. Second, after the peers have passed the training assessment, cancer survivors will be recruited to carry out two rounds of peer narrative support for six months. The model framework will be revised in conjunction with observation and reflection during the action. (iii) Evaluation: A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to assess the feasibility and scientific validity of the peer narrative support model and to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. The research methods used include theoretical research, literature review, expert meeting method, participatory observation method, interview method, and questionnaire survey method. DISCUSSION: China currently has cancer rehabilitation associations in most provinces, cities, and counties, and peer volunteers in these organisations use their personal experience to help other cancer patients. Currently, the content of their help is mostly limited to disease recovery and financial condolences, and there is a lack of scientific training for peer volunteers. This study aims to help patients cope with their suffering and eventually return to work by narrating the stories of role models. The narrative support covers three aspects: focusing on recovery, rebuilding effectiveness, and adjusting planning. In addition, this study relies on the methodology of action research to develop a peer narrative support model, training program, and implementation plan, which are more applicable to the national context of peer support for cancer patients in China. This will provide scientific guidance for the Chinese Cancer Rehabilitation Association to develop peer narrative support and guide cancer survivors back to work.

trial registrationThis study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number ChiCTR2300068403) on Feb 17, 2023. (Retrospectively registered) https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=183766 .

Indexed as

Action researchCancer survivorsNarrativePeer supportProtocolReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID39849658
PMCPMC11755956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.