ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Differential diagnostic value of P wave dispersion and QT interval dispersion between psychogenic pseudosyncope and vasovagal syncope in children and adolescents.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Difference in clinical characteristics between functional syncope and vasovagal syncope in children.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The Changes of T-Wave Amplitude and Tp-Te Interval in the Supine and Standing Electrocardiograms of Pediatric Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and Their Predictive Value for the Intervention Effect of Metoprolol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-Term Prognosis and Impact Factors of Metoprolol Treatment in Children with Vasovagal Syncope.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoth psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS) and vasovagal syncope (VVS) in children and adolescents are diseases of transient loss of consciousness. It is difficult to distinguish them clinically. This paper will study the differential diagnostic value of P wave dispersion (Pd) and QT interval dispersion (QTd) between PPS and VVS.
methodsThe 31 children with PPS and 40 children with VVS from July 2014 to November 2023 were enrolled as the study group. Meanwhile, 30 healthy children who underwent a physical examination at the same hospital were matched to the control group. P wave duration and QT interval in the 12-lead electrocardiogram were measured at the baseline.
results(1) Comparison between groups: ① The Pd, corrected P wave dispersion (Pcd), QTd, and corrected QT interval dispersion (QTcd) in PPS group were significantly higher than those in control group (P < 0.05). The minimum P wave duration (Pmin) and corrected P wave duration (Pcmin) in PPS group were significantly lower than those in control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in maximum P wave duration (Pmax), corrected maximum P-wave duration (Pcmax), maximum QT interval (QTmax), minimum QT interval (QTmin), corrected maximum QT interval (QTcmax), and corrected minimum QT interval (QTcmin) between PPS group and control group (P > 0.05). ② The Pd, Pcd, QTd, and QTcd in VVS group were significantly higher than those in control group (P < 0.05). The Pmin, Pcmin, and QTcmin in VVS group were significantly lower than those in control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in Pmax, Pcmax, QTmax, QTmin, and QTcmax between VVS group and control group (P > 0.05). ③ The Pmax, Pd, QTmax, QTd, and QTcd in PPS group were significantly lower than those in VVS group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in Pmin, Pcmax, Pcmin, Pcd, QTmin, QTcmax, and QTcmin between PPS group and VVS group (P > 0.05). (2) ROC curve: Pmax, Pd, QTmax, QTd, and QTcd had a certain differential diagnostic value between PPS and VVS in children and adolescents (P < 0.05). QTd had the largest area under curve (0.735), with a sensitivity of 85.00% and a specificity of 53.30% at the cut off value of ≥ 28.11 ms for VVS diagnosis.
conclusionsIn children and adolescents, electrocardiogram parameters such as Pmax, Pd, QTmax, QTd, and QTcd all possess predictive value in differentiating between PPS and VVS. Among them, QTd has the greatest differential diagnostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.