ArticleMicrobiome2025
No microorganism was detected in amniotic fluid of healthy pregnancies from the second trimester to the delivery.
Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra-amniotic infection: diagnosis, nomenclature, clinical significance, management, and microbiologic tools used for the diagnosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Vaginal Microbiome Profiles and Reproductive Outcomes: Implications for Natural Conception and Assisted Reproduction.Cureus · 2026Review
- Protecting Newborns from Multidrug-Resistant Infections: The Emerging Role of Bacteriophages.Viruses · 2026Review
- Progressive microbial alterations in the human gut and lung across early life: implications for translational medicine.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The possibility of Escherichia coli transmission from pregnant women to the neonates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- Early-Life Development of the Intestinal Microbiome in Preterm and Term Infants Hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Observational
- Gestational diabetes mellitus alters neonatal gut microbiota and increases infection susceptibility.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe early colonization and establishment of the microbiome in newborns is a crucial step in the development of the immune system and host metabolism. However, the exact timing of initial microbial colonization remains a subject of ongoing debate. While numerous studies have attempted to determine the presence or absence of intrauterine bacteria, the majority of them have drawn conclusions based on sequencing data from maternal or infant samples taken at a single time point. In this study, we aimed to investigate the microbial population in amniotic fluid (AF) from the second trimester until the time of delivery using multiple microbiological methods.
methodsAF samples were collected during the second trimester (19-21 gestational weeks) and at the time of delivery. Cohort 1 included 51 women who underwent the term and elective cesarean section, with both their second trimester and delivery AF samples (n = 55, respectively) analyzed. Cohort 2 contained 22 women who experienced infection-related adverse pregnancy outcomes (including preterm birth, histological chorioamnionitis, and stillbirth), with only their second trimester AF samples (n = 24) examined. Additionally, multiple procedural negative controls and technical positive controls were applied to this study to remove potential contamination. Microbial profiles were assessed through cultivation, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, and cytokine analysis.
resultsIn cohort 1, the bacterial load and community structure in the second trimester AF samples were indistinguishable from negative controls. Although marginally higher bacterial loads and different bacterial communities were observed in the delivery AF samples compared to negative controls, these bacterial DNA were not considered biologically functional due to the absence of maternal inflammatory responses. In cohort 2, the bacterial load and community structure of the second trimester AF samples differed significantly from those of negative controls, with Ureaplasma and Lactobacillus identified as the most prevalent genera against negative controls.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that no microorganisms were detected in the AF of healthy pregnancies from the second trimester to the delivery. The presence of Ureaplasma and Lactobacillus in the second trimester AF may be associated with infection-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.