ArticleSystematic reviews2025
The resilience of parents and carers who administer medicines to children at home: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Disruptions to safety and adaptations experienced by parents and caregivers who administered prescribed medicines to children at home: a systematic review using a framework synthesis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting Healthcare Workload in Pediatric Home Hospitalization: The Role of Patient Complexity and Family Participation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParents and carers are increasingly expected to administer prescribed medicines to their children at home. However, parents and carers are not always able to administer medicines as directed by the prescriber and ultimately must rely on their own judgment to administer medicines safely. This process is often unseen but may contain important learning for professionals, academics, and wider society. Studying safety in everyday healthcare work presents researchers with many challenges. However, recent developments in our understanding of resilience and how it manifests within healthcare can provide an effective framework for enquiry. The aim of this review is to use resilience theory to explore parents' and carers' experiences when administering medicines to children at home.
methodsThis systematic review will follow the framework synthesis method. An iterative search strategy, using a scoping search of the major databases (Embase, PyscINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane and PubMed) will be used. The three main search terms are parents and carers, administration of medicines, and the home environment. Included studies will contain qualitative data and investigate the experiences of parents or carers who administer prescribed medicines to children at home. Relevant studies will be quality assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Framework synthesis will be completed by following five stages: familiarisation, thematic framework identification, indexing, charting, mapping, and interpretation. The findings identified in the data extraction phase will be indexed and charted according to the three elements of Moments of Resilience theory. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes a novel method to address an important patient safety issue. A strength of this review will be not only to identify, describe and collate existing studies, but also to learn about the application of resilience theory to a medication safety topic. The knowledge generated from this will inform intervention development to improve the support for families to administer medicines safely at home. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This review has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO) #487154.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.