Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Optimising patient engagement for assessing total joint arthroplasty outcomes - a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging postural biomechanics and knee arthroplasty success.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient satisfaction is a critical outcome in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), yet assessing it effectively remains a challenge due to limitations in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). While these measures are commonly gathered in clinical settings, additional contact through mail or phone is often needed, and low response rates can affect the validity and reliability of collected data. To improve response rates, this study evaluated various methods of incentivizing patient participation in a randomized trial format, focusing on postal questionnaires. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe study investigated three methods to improve response rates: including a gift card with the questionnaire, promising a gift card upon questionnaire completion, and offering no incentive. It also examined whether different monetary values and the inclusion of the surgeon's name on materials impacted response rates. We tried to determine factors that could improve follow up telephone response rates in the group of patients that failed to return their questionnaires.
resultsHigher response rates were observed with monetary incentives (P = 0.056), larger amounts of money offered (P = 0.3839) for filling out the questionnaire, and if the surgeon's details were on the cover letter or questionnaire (P = 0.632). There was no correlation between age and sex and participation. We did find a statistically significant difference in total participation and poorer total knee arthroplasty outcomes scores (P < 0.001).
conclusionOur study supports findings from prior research indicating that monetary incentives and personalized materials can improve response rates, although in this cohort, results were modest. Follow-up calls further boosted response rates, suggesting that multi-modal engagement may be beneficial. Although the response improvements were limited and lacked statistical significance, the study highlights the importance of refining strategies to ensure reliable PROMS data, which is vital for understanding patient outcomes in TJA. Future studies might consider demographic factors and other outreach methods to enhance PROMs data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.