Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849579›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Consensus representation of multiple cell-cell graphs from gene signaling pathways for cell type annotation.

Yu-An Huang, Yue-Chao Li, Zhu-Hong You, Lun Hu, Peng-Wei Hu, Lei Wang, Yuzhong Peng, Zhi-An Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-An Huang *School of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710000, China. yuanhuang@nwpu.edu.cn.
Yue-Chao Li *School of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Zhu-Hong YouSchool of Electronic Information, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710000, China. zhuhongyou@gmail.com.
Lun HuXinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi, 830011, China.
Peng-Wei HuXinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi, 830011, China.
Lei WangGuangxi Key Lab of Human-Machine Interaction and Intelligent Decision, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning, 530001, China.
Yuzhong PengGuangxi Key Lab of Human-Machine Interaction and Intelligent Decision, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, 530001, China.
Zhi-An HuangResearch Office, City University of Hong Kong (Dongguan), Dongguan, 523000, China. huang.za@cityu-dg.edu.cn.

Funding

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities D5000230199the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities G2023KY05102the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2024A1515011984the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62002297the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62472353the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China 62325308the Neural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province 2022JQ-700the Science and Technology Innovation 2030-New Generation Artificial Intelligence Major Project 2018AAA0100103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing have greatly expanded our knowledge of the heterogeneous nature of tissues. However, robust and accurate cell type annotation continues to be a major challenge, hindered by issues such as marker specificity, batch effects, and a lack of comprehensive spatial and interaction data. Traditional annotation methods often fail to adequately address the complexity of cellular interactions and gene regulatory networks.

resultsWe proposed scMCGraph, a comprehensive computational framework that integrates gene expression with pathway activity to accurately annotate cell types within diverse scRNA-seq datasets. Initially, our model constructs multiple pathway-specific views using various pathway databases, which reflect both gene expression and pathway activities. These pathway-specific views are then integrated into a consensus graph. The consensus graph is subsequently utilized to reconstruct the multiple pathway views. Our model demonstrated exceptional robustness and accuracy across various analyses, including cross-platform, cross-time, cross-sample, and clinical dataset evaluations.

conclusionsscMCGraph represents a significant advance in cell type annotation. The experiments have demonstrated that introducing pathway information significantly improves the learning of cell-cell graphs, with their resulting consensus graph enhancing the predictive performance of cell type prediction. Different pathway databases provide complementary data, and an increase in the number of pathways can also boost model performance. Extensive testing shows that in various cross-dataset application scenarios, scMCGraph consistently exhibits both accuracy and robustness.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksSignal TransductionSingle-Cell AnalysisHumansCell type annotationCellular communicationConsensus graphPathway integrationSingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39849579
PMCPMC11756145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.