ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Development and validation of a prediction model for chronic post-surgical pain risk: a single-center prospective study of video-assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Single-Injection Versus Dual-Injection Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Analgesic Effect After Dual-Microport Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain research & management · 2026Trial
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the utility of chronic postsurgical pain prediction profiles in perioperative care: a qualitative study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Prediction Models for Acute and Chronic Postoperative Pain in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Dynamic prediction model for early postoperative pain based on generalized estimating equations: a multi-timepoint longitudinal study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Intercostal Nerve Block on Chronic Postoperative Pain Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is a common complication following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Although multiple risk factors have been identified, no systematically validated prediction model exists to guide clinical decision-making.
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for CPSP in patients undergoing VATS for lung cancer.
methodsThis prospective cohort study included clinical data from 400 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent VATS from June 2022 to June 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and an internal test cohort and assessed for sleep quality, psychological status, and pain levels. A nomogram prediction model was established based on variables significantly associated with CPSP in the training cohort. The model was internally validated in the internal test cohort to evaluate its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
resultsIndependent risk factors for CPSP included female gender, severe acute pain post-surgery, lymph node dissection, and cold pain sensation, while paravertebral nerve block was identified as a protective factor. The AUC values were 0.878 in training cohort and 0.805 in internal test cohort, respectively, indicating that the model performed well in identifying patients at risk for CPSP. The calibration curves in both cohorts showed a good fit, indicating that the model's predictions were reliable. And the DCA curve showed that using our model to guide decisions resulted in a higher net benefit compared to a strategy of not screening or treating all patients.
conclusionAn effective risk prediction model for CPSP was successfully developed and validated in this study. This model can aid physicians in conducting more accurate assessments of CPSP risk in patients prior to surgery and in offering personalized strategies for managing CPSP. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registration website: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ . Registration date: 2022/5/21. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200060196.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.