Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849551›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

In vitro long-term exposure to chlorhexidine or triclosan induces cross-resistance against azoles in Nakaseomyces glabratus.

Kathrin Spettel, Dominik Bumberger, Richard Kriz, Sarah Frank, Madita Loy, Sonia Galazka, Miranda Suchomel, Heimo Lagler, Athanasios Makristathis, Birgit Willinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathrin Spettel *Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Dominik Bumberger *Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Richard KrizSection Biomedical Science, Health Sciences, FH Campus Wien University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, 1100, Austria.
Sarah FrankDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Madita LoyDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Sonia GalazkaDivision of Data, Statistics and Risk Assessment, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety AGES, Vienna, 1220, Austria.
Miranda SuchomelInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Heimo LaglerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Athanasios MakristathisDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Birgit WillingerDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria. birgit.willinger@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopical antiseptics are crucial for preventing infections and reducing transmission of pathogens. However, commonly used antiseptic agents have been reported to cause cross-resistance to other antimicrobials in bacteria, which has not yet been described in yeasts. This study aims to assess the in vitro efficacy of antiseptics against clinical and reference isolates of Candida albicans and Nakaseomyces glabratus, and whether prolonged exposure to antiseptics promotes the development of antifungal (cross)resistance.

methodsA high-throughput approach for in vitro resistance development was established to simultaneously expose 96 C. albicans and N. glabratus isolates to increasing concentrations of a given antiseptic - chlorhexidine, triclosan or octenidine. Susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing of yeast isolates pre- and post-exposure were performed.

resultsLong-term exposure to antiseptics does not result in the development of stable resistance to the antiseptics themselves. However, 50 N. glabratus isolates acquired resistance to azole antifungals after long-term exposure to triclosan or chlorhexidine, revealing newly acquired mutations in the PDR1 and PMA1 genes.

conclusionsChlorhexidine as well as triclosan, but not octenidine, were able to introduce selective pressure promoting resistance to azole antifungals. Although we assessed this phenomenon only in vitro, these findings warrant critical monitoring in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAzolesChlorhexidineDrug Resistance, FungalTriclosanCandida albicansHumansIminesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyridinesWhole Genome SequencingAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAzolesChlorhexidineIminesoctenidinePyridinesTriclosanAntisepticsCandidaChlorhexidineCross-resistanceNakaseomycesOctenidineTriclosan

Identifiers

PMID39849551
PMCPMC11755926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.