ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2025
Frequency of remission achievement in the pre-treat-to-target decade in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early intensification versus step-up biologic strategies in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of remission and safety outcomes.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Pooled it
- Discordance between non-zero physician's global scores and absence of active joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: multicenter vs. single-center cohorts.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Ethnic heterogeneity of juvenile arthritis in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) related to a high human leukocyte antigen B27 frequency.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- Forecasting Achievement of Inactive Disease in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis with Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past two decades there has been a remarkable advance in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), which has led to considerable improvement in prognosis. In 2018, the introduction of the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in JIA has been advocated to further ameliorate disease outcome. To provide a benchmark for comparing future outcomes in the "T2T era", this study investigates the percentage of JIA patients who achieved clinical inactive disease (CID) in the decade that preceded the publication of the T2T recommendations in JIA.
methodsThe clinical charts of all JIA patients followed at the study center between 2007 and 2017 who were first seen within 6 months after disease onset and had a minimum of 6-month follow-up information available were reviewed retrospectively. The attainment of CID, defined by 2004 Wallace criteria, was assessed cross-sectionally at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after first observation.
resultsA total of 394 patients were included. Patients were classified into four "functional phenotypes": systemic arthritis (7.1%), oligoarthritis (48.2%), polyarthritis (40.4%), and other arthritis (4.3%). The overall frequency of CID was 25.1% at 6 months, 34.5% at 12 months, 44.6% at 24 months, and 49.1% at 60 months. The systemic and oligoarticular subgroups had the highest rates of CID at 6 months (32.1% and 29.5%, respectively) and at 12 months (40% and 41.1%, respectively). At the 60-month evaluation, which was available for 226 out of 394 patients (57.4%), the frequency of CID among patients still followed at study center was 42.9%, 51.7%, 46.7%, and 45.5% for the systemic, oligoarticular, polyarticular, and other arthritis phenotypes, respectively.
conclusionA sizeable proportion of patients treated in the decade preceding the beginning of the "T2T era" and on continued follow-up did not achieve or maintain the state of CID over the long term. Future studies will determine whether the application of the T2T strategy increases the ability to achieve sustained disease quiescence in patients who respond suboptimally to the conventional therapeutic regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.