ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Enhancing doctor-patient communication using large language models for pathology report interpretation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Large Language Model-Based AI Tools on Physician-Patient Communication: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Applying Large Language Models in Perioperative Medicine With an Equity-Informed Perspective.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2026Article
- Large language models for interpretation of health checkup results.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models in Health Care Communication: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Ethical Governance of Large Language Models in Health Care: Trust, Responsibility, and Equity in Routine Use.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Configuring large language models to deliver patient-facing explanations of pathology reports.American journal of clinical pathology · 2026Article
- Potential of large language models for rapid clinical information support: evidence from acute kidney injury knowledge testing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Benchmarking large language models against human experts in rehabilitation medicine: a multidimensional evaluation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Mapping applications and evaluations of LLM-enabled AI chatbots for health purposes: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Foundation models: Insights and implications for gastrointestinal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing Adoption of Large Language Models in Health Care: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Using ChatGPT-4 for Lay Summarization in Prostate Cancer Research to Advance Patient-Centered Communication: Large-Scale Generative AI Performance Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Current Perspectives on the Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Anesthesiology clinics · 2025Review
- Cross language transformation of free text into structured lobectomy surgical records from a multi center study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Harnessing GPT-4 for automated error detection in pathology reports: Implications for oncology diagnostics.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in healthcare settings. Postoperative pathology reports, which are essential for diagnosing and determining treatment strategies for surgical patients, frequently include complex data that can be challenging for patients to comprehend. This complexity can adversely affect the quality of communication between doctors and patients about their diagnosis and treatment options, potentially impacting patient outcomes such as understanding of their condition, treatment adherence, and overall satisfaction. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study analyzed text pathology reports from four hospitals between October and December 2023, focusing on malignant tumors. Using GPT-4, we developed templates for interpretive pathology reports (IPRs) to simplify medical terminology for non-professionals. We randomly selected 70 reports to generate these templates and evaluated the remaining 628 reports for consistency and readability. Patient understanding was measured using a custom-designed pathology report understanding level assessment scale, scored by volunteers with no medical background. The study also recorded doctor-patient communication time and patient comprehension levels before and after using IPRs.
resultsAmong 698 pathology reports analyzed, the interpretation through LLMs significantly improved readability and patient understanding. The average communication time between doctors and patients decreased by over 70%, from 35 to 10 min (P < 0.001), with the use of IPRs. The study also found that patients scored higher on understanding levels when provided with AI-generated reports, from 5.23 points to 7.98 points (P < 0.001), with the use of IPRs. indicating an effective translation of complex medical information. Consistency between original pathology reports (OPRs) and IPRs was also evaluated, with results showing high levels of consistency across all assessed dimensions, achieving an average score of 4.95 out of 5.
conclusionThis research demonstrates the efficacy of LLMs like GPT-4 in enhancing doctor-patient communication by translating pathology reports into more accessible language. While this study did not directly measure patient outcomes or satisfaction, it provides evidence that improved understanding and reduced communication time may positively influence patient engagement. These findings highlight the potential of AI to bridge gaps between medical professionals and the public in healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.