Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849501›Full record

Trial reportBMC endocrine disorders2025

Comparison of the two treatment methods in primary hyperparathyroidism due to solitary parathyroid adenoma, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous alcohol ablation vs. parathyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Mohammad Eslamian, Babak Tavakoli, Alireza Firouzfar, Alireza Pouramini, Bijan Iraj, Mohsen Kolahdouzan, Marjan Mansourian

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC endocrine disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad EslamianDepartment of General Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Babak TavakoliDepartment of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza FirouzfarDepartment of General Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza PouraminiKerman Neuroscience Research Center, Neuropharmacology Institute, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Bijan IrajDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. bijaniraj@gmail.com.
Mohsen KolahdouzanDepartment of General Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Marjan MansourianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is the third most common endocrine system disorder. Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is the gold standard of care in symptomatic patients. Patients who are not surgical candidates may benefit from percutaneous ethanol ablation, which is a minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PTx vs. PEA.

methodA single-centered randomized, not-blinded parallel clinical trial in consecutive patients with pHPT treated with percutaneous alcohol ablation (PEA) between January 2020 and November 2021. Patients with a confirmed solitary parathyroid adenoma and a biochemically verified pHPT were randomly enrolled in the PTx or PEA groups. Complications and lab data were evaluated 24 h, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following interventions. Effectiveness was defined as complete response (normal calcium and PTH), partial response (reduced but not normalized PTH with normal serum calcium), or disease persistence (elevated calcium and PTH). SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis.

resultThe final sample comprised 68 patients in each group which 113 of whom were female (83.0%). Complete response was observed in 91.1% (n = 62) of the PEA group and 98.5% (n = 67) of the PTx group. According to repeated-measures analysis, Calcium, PTH, Phosphorus, and Alkaline phosphatase fell significantly and continuously in each intervention group, except for the persistent patients. According to ROC analysis, a cutoff of > 425.5 mm3 for the adenoma volume and > 13.5 mm for its largest diameter showed a sensitivity = 75% and specificity = 69% for partial response in the PEA group (AUC = 0.81 and 0.84, respectively). PTx group experienced statistically significant higher pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS score) (p < 0.001).

conclusionPTH, serum-adjusted Calcium, and adenoma size and volume were all significantly reduced by PTx and PEA, with no significant difference between them. PEA is an effective alternative to PTx, particularly in adenomas with a volume of less than 425.5 mm3 and a maximum diameter of 13.5 mm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT20210204050241N1 (04/26/2021).

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesAdenomaEthanolHyperparathyroidism, PrimaryParathyroidectomyParathyroid NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyEthanolAblation techniquesParathyroid adenomaParathyroidectomyPrimary hyperparathyroidism

Identifiers

PMID39849501
PMCPMC11761177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.