Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849458›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2025

Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines.

Tony J F Guo, Wan Yi Liang, Gurpreet K Singhera, Jasmine Memar Vaghri, Janice M Leung, Del R Dorscheid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tony J F GuoCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. tony.guo@hli.ubc.ca.
Wan Yi LiangCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Gurpreet K SingheraCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Jasmine Memar VaghriCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Janice M LeungCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Del R DorscheidCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemical transfection is a widely employed technique in airway epithelium research, enabling the study of gene expression changes and effects. Additionally, it has been explored for its potential application in delivering gene therapies. Here, we characterize the transfection efficiency of EX-EGFP-Lv105, an EGFP-expressing plasmid into three cell lines commonly used to model the airway epithelium (1HAEo-, 16HBE14o-, and NCI-H292).

resultsWe used six common and/or commercially available reagents with varying chemical compositions: Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000), FuGENE HD, ViaFect, jetOPTIMUS, EndoFectin, and calcium phosphate. Using L3000, 1HAEo- exhibited the highest transfection efficiency compared to 16HBE14o- and NCI-H292 (1HAEo-: 76.1 ± 3.2%, 16HBE14o-: 35.5 ± 1.2%, NCI-H292: 28.9 ± 2.23%). L3000 yielded the greatest transfection efficiency with the lowest impact on cellular viability, normalized to control, with a 11.3 ± 0.16% reduction in 1HAEo-, 16.3 ± 0.08% reduction in 16HBE14o-, and 17.5 ± 0.09% reduction in NCI-H292 at 48-hour post-transfection. However, jetOPTIMUS had a similar transfection efficiency in 1HAEo- (90.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.94), but had significantly reduced cellular viability of 37.4 ± 0.11% (p < 0.0001) compared to L3000. In 16HBE14o-, jetOPTIMUS yielded a significantly higher transfection efficiency compared to L3000 (64.6 ± 3.2%, p < 0.0001) but significantly reduced viability of 33.4 ± 0.09% (p < 0.0001) compared to L3000. In NCI-H292, jetOPTIMUS yielded a lower transfection efficiency (22.6 ± 1.2%) with a significant reduction in viability (28.3 ± 0.9%, p < 0.0001). Other reagents varied significantly in their efficiency and impact on cellular viability in other cell lines. Changing the transfection mixture-containing medium at 6-hour post-transfection did not improve transfection efficiency or viability. However, pre-treatment of cell cultures with two rinses of 0.25% trypsin-EDTA improved transfection efficiency in 1HAEo- (85.2 ± 1.1% vs. 71.3 ± 1.0%, p = 0.004) and 16HBE14o- (62.6 ± 4.3 vs. 35.5 ± 1.2, p = 0.003).

conclusionsTransfection efficiencies can differ based on airway epithelial cell line, reagents, and optimization techniques used. Consideration and optimization of cell line and transfection conditions may be useful for improving nonviral genetic techniques in vitro.

Indexed as

Epithelial CellsRespiratory MucosaTransfectionCell LineCell SurvivalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLipidsPlasmidsenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLipidsLipofectamineAirway epitheliumChemical transfectionOptimization

Identifiers

PMID39849458
PMCPMC11761256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.