ArticleBMC medical education2025
Honoring donors: medical students' reflections on cadaveric dissection.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the moral status of cadavers through artificial intelligence: a thematic analysis of AI-based perspectives in anatomy education.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Article
- Using artificial intelligence thanabots as "thanatobots" to assist anatomy learning and professional development: Ghosts masquerading as opportunity?Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- Scalpels and Standards: What Students Consider Ethical, Unethical, and Ethically Challenging in the Anatomy Lab.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Emotional distress among medical students before and after the first exposure to a full cadaver dissection: a quantitative study using DASS-21.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Anatomy at the threshold: Teaching the human body in a hybrid age.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
- Social Norms and Medical Students' Engagement With Cadaveric Dissection: A Qualitative Study and Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement (IMCE Model).Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Objectification, Desensitization, and Personification: Medical Student Strategies for Engaging with Donor Bodies in the Anatomy Lab.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCadaveric dissection is an essential practice for medical students to understand human anatomy and internalize professional attitudes toward death, such as empathy and respect for the deceased. Previous studies have focused on emotional responses such as shock, anxiety, and fear at the start of dissection practice. However, limited research exists on students' reflective thinking and perceptions before practice. This study aims is to understand premedical students' perceptions and attitudes before dissection by analyzing their reflective writing.
methodsText network analysis of essays written in 2022 by 136 s-year premedical students before cadaveric dissection was performed. Keywords were preprocessed to extract significant themes. Centrality analysis and topic modeling were performed to analyze students' perceptions and attitudes.
resultsCentrality analysis identified "cadaveric dissection," "donation," and "gratitude" as major keywords, indicating the students' deep appreciation and respect for donors. Two main topics emerged from topic modeling. The first, "gratitude and respect for donors," included keywords such as "gratitude" and "donation." The second, "growth and responsibility of doctors through medical study and practice," included keywords such as "study" and "medical school."
conclusionThe participants had profound gratitude and respect for donors before cadaveric dissection, which increased their motivation to learn. Analyzing reflective writing is an effective approach to understanding students' initial perceptions and attitudes toward cadaveric dissection; further, it can inform educational strategies that aid students in forming their professional identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.