ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2025
Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to describe the microbial characteristics of diabetic foot ulcers at a tertiary medical center in South China.
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation and wound healing: a comprehensive overview of mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational perspectives.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Metagenomic and Phenotypic Insights Into Biofilm-Forming Pathogens in Patients With Nosocomial Sepsis.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- A framework of Microbial Genomic Database for clinical metagenomic pathogen diagnosis: development and multi-cohort evaluation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- 25-(OH)D Deficiency and the Risk of Minor Amputation in Patients with Diabetes Foot Ulcers: A Chinese Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are characterized by dynamic wound microbiome, the timely and accurate identification of pathogens in the clinic is required to initiate precise and individualized treatment. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been a useful supplement to routine culture method for the etiological diagnosis of DFUs. In this study, we utilized a routine culture method and mNGS to analyze the same DFU wound samples and the results were compared.
methodsForty samples from patients with DFUs at a tertiary medical center in South China were collected, the microorganisms were identified with mNGS and routine culture method simultaneously.
resultsThe results showed that the positive detection rate of microorganisms in DFUs with mNGS was much higher (95% vs. 60%). Thirteen strains of microorganisms were detected with routine culture method, and seventy-seven strains were detected with mNGS. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism detected with culture method, while Enterococcus faecalis was the most common microorganism detected with mNGS. The false negative rate of the culture method was 35%, that was, 14 samples with negative results with culture method were found to be positive with mNGS.
conclusionThe mNGS method had a higher positive detection rate and identified a broader spectrum of microorganisms in DFUs, thus, mNGS provided a more comprehensive understanding of the microbiome of DFUs to facilitate the development of timely and optimal treatment.
trial registrationThe study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (approval number 2021KY054).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.