Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849405›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Equity and efficiency of public health resource allocation in China.

Minghua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Minghua ZhouDepartment of Administration Office, Luzhou People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646000, China. minghuawind@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the equity and efficiency of public health resource allocation in China from 2018 to 2022, and to provide a scientific basis for promoting the development of public health resources in China.

methodsData on public health resources of 31 provincial-level administrative regions in mainland China were extracted from 2018 to 2022, and descriptive analysis, Theil index, and health resource agglomeration degree (HRAD) were used to analyze the equity, and data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to analyze the efficiency.

resultsThe Theil index of public health resource allocation by population in China ranges from 0.006 to 0.049, and the Theil index contribution rate of the number of beds, health technicians, licensed (assistant) physicians, and registered nurses within region is less than 28.76%. The Theil index of public health resource allocation by geography in China ranges from 0.274 to 0.624, and the Theil index contribution rate of the number of institutions, the number of beds, health technicians, licensed (assistant) physicians, and registered nurses within region is more than 77.05%. The HRAD of public health resources is more than 2.18 in the eastern and central regions, while the HRAD of public health resources is less than 1 in the northeastern and western regions. The overall HRAD/population agglomeration degree (PAD) is less than 1 in the northeastern and eastern regions, and greater than 1 in the central and western regions overall. The scale efficiency and overall efficiency of public health resource allocation in China are not 1, the returns to scale are decreasing, and the DEA is relatively ineffective from 2019 to 2022.

conclusionThe equity by geography is slightly worse than the equity by population, and the inequity by population mainly comes from between regions, while the inequity by geography mainly comes from within regions. There is a contradiction in the equity by population and by geography allocation in the eastern and western regions, and a congruence in the equity by population and by geography allocation in the northeastern and central regions. The DEA of public health resource allocation in China is relatively ineffective in 2019-2022.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalHealth EquityPublic HealthResource AllocationChinaHumansChinaEfficiencyEquityHealth resource agglomeration degreePublic health resources

Identifiers

PMID39849405
PMCPMC11755805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.