Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849374›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025

Patterns of beta-blocker use and dose optimization among ambulatory heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) attending public hospitals in Northeast Ethiopia: a multi-center cross-sectional study.

Minimize Hassen, Tsehaynesh Kebede Ebsa, Oumer Sada Muhammed, Tewodros Solomon, Mulat Belete Demessie, Teklehaimanot Fentie Wendie, Nuhamin Alemayehu Tesfaye, Mengistie Yirsaw Gobezie

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Minimize HassenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia. minihassen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-307X
Tsehaynesh Kebede EbsaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Oumer Sada MuhammedDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tewodros SolomonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Mulat Belete DemessieDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Teklehaimanot Fentie WendieDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Nuhamin Alemayehu TesfayeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Mengistie Yirsaw GobezieDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based beta-blockers are essential in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and are known to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Despite robust nascent guideline recommendations, studies indicate that beta-blockers are often underutilized or administered below target doses. This shivery issue is particularly relevant in Ethiopia, where comprehensive evaluations of beta-blocker utilization and dosing practices are limited. The Northeast region, specifically Dessie, remains underexplored in this context.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the appropriate usage trend and dose optimization of beta-blockers among HFrEF patients attending ambulatory clinics of Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DCSH) and Boru Meda General Hospital (BMH), Dessie, Ethiopia, 2024 G.C.

methodsA cross-sectional, multi-center study was conducted from February 1 to July 30, 2024, involving 200 randomly selected adult patients with confirmed HFrEF (120 from DCSH and 80 from BMH), who had at least 6-month regular follow-up visits at their respective ambulatory clinics. The study rigorously followed the latest (2022) American Heart Association (AHA) guideline recommendation. Patient's medical records was reviewed to gather the necessary data. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with beta-blocker use. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05.

resultsAmong the 200 patients, 88% were prescribed beta-blockers. About 15% of the patients were not receiving beta-blockers whereas they are indicated. Out of the total, 96.5% received guideline-recommended beta-blockers, with bisoprolol being the most common (65%), followed by metoprolol (29%) and carvedilol (3%). Only 13% of beta-blocker users were on optimal doses, with average daily doses of 27.9 mg for metoprolol succinate, 10.0 mg for carvedilol, and 4.8 mg for bisoprolol. Factors positively associated with beta-blocker use included Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor use (AOR: 15.48, 95% CI: 2.11-113.54, p = 0.007), and taking multiple medications (AOR: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.54-33.02, p = 0.012), while ingestion of secondary prevention agents (AOR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.98, p = 0.048) and male gender (AOR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.47, p = 0.005) were negatively associated. Baseline ejection fraction of 25-40% (AOR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.09-27.12, P = 0.039) was a sole predictor for sub-optimal beta-blocker use.

conclusionAlthough most patients with HFrEF were prescribed evidence-based beta-blockers, only a limited number reached the optimal dosing levels. It is crucial to align clinical practice with the latest guidelines, prioritize ongoing research, and enhance educational efforts for both healthcare providers and patients. By doing so, it is possible to significantly improve the effective utilization of beta-blockers, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in this region.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAmbulatory CareHeart FailureHospitals, PublicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Stroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsDose optimizationEthiopiaEvidence-based beta-blockerHFrEFUtilization pattern

Identifiers

PMID39849374
PMCPMC11756068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.