Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849373›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Design and psychometric testing of a moral intelligence instrument for pre-hospital emergency medical services personnel: a sequential-exploratory mixed-method study.

Fateme Mohammadi, Rasoul Salimi, Salman Khazaei, Mostafa Bijani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fateme MohammadiChronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center and Autism Spectrum Disorders Research Center, Department of Nursing, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Rasoul SalimiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Besat Hospital Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Salman KhazaeiEnvironmental Health Engineering, Department of Environmental Health, School of Health Research Center for Health Sciences, Health Sciences & Technology Research Institute, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mostafa BijaniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, 81936-13119, Iran. bizhani_mostafa@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoral intelligence is a significant and influential factor in the delivery of principled and high-quality care. This is because moral intelligence is the ability to recognize and be sensitive to moral issues, which contributes to the organization of appropriate behavior in the face of moral issues. This is particularly pertinent given that pre-hospital emergency medical services personnel (prehospital EMS personnel) frequently encounter stressful and tension-filled situations. Thus, intelligent reasoning and ethical conduct at the scene of an incident are of paramount importance. Also, there is no special tool available for measuring the moral intelligence of prehospital EMS personnel. Hence, there is a necessity for the design and psychometric evaluation of a specialized instrument to assess the moral intelligence of prehospital EMS personnel with a sequential exploratory approach. Accordingly, the present study was conceptualized and implemented with the objective of designing and psychometrically evaluating an instrument for measuring the moral intelligence of prehospital EMS personnel.

methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods design with a sequential exploratory approach. The research was executed in two distinct phases. In the first phase, a conventional content analysis method was utilized to explore narratives expressed by 34 prehospital EMS personnel. It was in the second phase where the psychometric properties including face validity, content validity, construct validity and reliability were measured. A total of 210 prehospital EMS personnel participated for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Bartlett's tests, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, as well as test-retest were used for data analysis.

resultsThe moral intelligence of prehospital EMS personnel was conceptualized as emotional stability coupled with intelligent reasoning, oriented towards the provision of ethical care and moral courage in patient advocacy. In the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) phase, the questionnaire was distilled into three dimensions: "Emotional stability combined with intelligent reasoning" (11 items), "Ethical care" (12 items), and "Ethical courage" (7 items), accounting for 74.38% of the observed variance. Confirmatory validity also confirmed the structure of the tool obtained from the previous step. The instrument's reliability, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, was reported at 0.95 for the entire scale.

conclusionThe Moral Intelligence Scale for prehospital EMS personnel demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Consequently, healthcare administrators may employ this instrument to assess moral intelligence in prehospital EMS personnel. Furthermore, when deemed necessary, they can identify and implement the most appropriate strategies, including educational interventions, to enhance moral intelligence among prehospital EMS personnel. Thus, it is suggested that future studies explore the psychometric properties of this tool with a larger sample size and in different cultures.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Medical TechniciansMoralsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency medical servicesMoral intelligencePsychometric evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39849373
PMCPMC11756141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.