Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849306›Full record

ArticleCurrent eye research2025

Integrating Retinal Segmentation Metrics with Machine Learning for Predictions from Mouse SD-OCT Scans.

Maide Gözde İnam, Onur İnam, Xiangjun Yang, Qun Zeng, Gülgün Tezel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maide Gözde İnamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Onur İnamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Xiangjun YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Qun ZengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Gülgün TezelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
Modulation of Neuroinflammation in GlaucomaR01EY033359 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TEZEL, GULGUN · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to initially test whether machine learning approaches could categorically predict two simple biological features, mouse age and mouse species, using the retinal segmentation metrics.

methodsThe retinal layer thickness data obtained from C57BL/6 and DBA/2J mice were processed for machine learning after segmenting mouse retinal SD-OCT scans. Twenty-two models were trained to predict the mouse groups. The best neural network model was optimized for better outcomes. Prediction accuracy, the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F-1 score values were obtained.

resultsThe Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test provided significantly higher validation accuracy for neural networks than decision trees, discriminant analysis, support vector machines, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers (

conclusionsThese findings validate that machine learning, using segmentation metrics instead of images, can effectively analyze retinal OCT scans in mice for categorical predictions in experimental models. Expanding this approach with additional features, including histopathological and functional correlations, is expected to improve the prediction power further, promising valuable applications to predict more complex outcomes in experimental and clinical studies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBANeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineArtificial intelligencemachine learningmouseoptical coherence tomographyretina

Identifiers

PMID39849306
PMCPMC12037304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.