Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849294›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors.

N Aggadi, S Krikawa, T A Paine, P Simen, C D Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N AggadiNeuroscience Department, Oberlin College, 173 Lorain St, Oberlin, OH, USA.
S KrikawaNeuroscience Department, Oberlin College, 173 Lorain St, Oberlin, OH, USA.
T A PaineNeuroscience Department, Oberlin College, 173 Lorain St, Oberlin, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-0658
P SimenNeuroscience Department, Oberlin College, 173 Lorain St, Oberlin, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5305-7703
C D HowardNeuroscience Department, Oberlin College, 173 Lorain St, Oberlin, OH, USA. choward@oberlin.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-6323

Funding

Determining the Contribution of Striatal Patches and Dopamine to Habit FormationR15MH122729 · NIMH · OBERLIN COLLEGE · PI HOWARD, CHRISTOPHER D · 2020 to 2020
$396k
NIMH NIH HHS 1R15MH122729-0NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH122729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keeping track of time intervals is a crucial aspect of behavior and cognition. Many theoretical models of how the brain times behavior make predictions for steady-state performance of well-learned intervals, but the rate of learning intervals in these models varies greatly, ranging from one-shot learning to learning over thousands of trials. Here, we explored how quickly rats and mice adapt to changes in interval durations using a serial fixed-interval task. In the first experiment, animals experienced randomly selected fixed-intervals of 12, 24, 36, 48, or 60 s, for blocks ranging from 13 to 21 trials. Consistent with previous work, animals abruptly increased lever pressing as reward availability approached, and these 'start times' scaled with the interval duration for both species. We then quantified the rate of updating to new trial durations and found that rodents consistently updated their start times within 2-3 trials following a change in interval duration, before stabilizing their behavior by the third or fourth trial. To account for repeated exposures to fixed-interval durations, a second set of animals was tested with new fixed-intervals after being trained on the serial fixed-interval task described above. Next, a third group was trained on fixed-interval durations that were generated de novo in each day. In each of these contexts, rodents rapidly increased or decreased their start times to mirror new FI durations following exposure to 1-2 trials of new intervals following block transitions. This work adds to growing evidence for rapid duration learning across species, highlighting the need for timing models to be capable of rapid updating in dynamic temporal scenarios.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, Long-EvansRewardDynamic timingInterval timingLearning

Identifiers

PMID39849294
PMCPMC11759285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.