SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep Learning Models for Radiomics-Based Segmentation of Vestibular Schwannoma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The application of machine learning in the prediction of sports injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics for differentiating high-grade from low-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of deep learning models for automatic histopathological grading of meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Research progress of deep learning based on magnetic resonance imaging in meningioma.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Advanced Deep Learning Architectures in MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification: A Systematic Review Focused on Meningiomas.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- MRI and Meningioma Research: Hotspots and Trends via Bibliometric AnalysisCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Brain MRI Radiomic First-Order Features for Presurgical Prediction of Meningioma Grading.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) grade of meningiomas is determined based on the biopsy results. Therefore, accurate non-invasive preoperative grading could significantly improve treatment planning and patient outcomes. Considering recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of these models in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. A systematic search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 1, 2024, and reporting the performance metrics of the ML models in predicting of WHO meningioma grade using imaging studies. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), specificity, and sensitivity were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed based on a number of potential influencing variables. A total of 32 studies with 15,365 patients were included in the present study. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of ML methods for prediction of tumor grade in meningioma were 85% (95% CI, 79-89%), 87% (95% CI, 81-91%), and 93% (95% CI, 90-95%), respectively. Both the type of validation and study cohort (training or test) were significantly associated with model performance. However, no significant association was found between the sample size or the type of ML method and model performance. The ML predictive models show a high overall performance in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. Further studies on the performance of DL algorithms in larger datasets using external validation are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39849257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.