ArticleLasers in medical science2025
ML-based tooth shade assessment to prevent metamerism in different clinic lights.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Multidimensional Analysis of Shade Selection Difficulty for Indirect Restorations Among Dental Students and Professionals.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Tooth color prediction in intraoral images under different clinical lights using ML algorithms and CLAHE technique: an In-Vivo study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aesthetic understanding has found its place in dental clinics and prosthetic dental treatment. Determining the appropriate prosthetic tooth color between the clinician, patient and technician is a difficult process due to metamerism. Metamerism, known as the different perception of the color of an object under different light sources, is caused by the lighting differences between the laboratory and the dental clinic. The traditional trial-error color determination method, coupled with the high cost of instrumental color value determination, has prompted the need for alternative technologies. The integration of AI technologies into dental practices aims to minimize errors in tooth shade assessment, reduce equipment usage, eliminate the impact of clinic lighting on color detection, and decrease costs for patients, dentists, and laboratories. In this study, a machine learning (ML) based approach that can correctly detect tooth shade even under different clinical lights has been developed. A dataset consisting of 580 dental images taken under four different clinical lights and with five repetitions was created using the Vita color shade guide. Experimental studies were performed using the HSV color space, 6 different ML algorithms and color histograms. As a result, 97.93% accuracy rate was achieved by using cross-validation (cv = 5) in the classification of 29 color values independent of clinical lights. It has been shown that the tooth colors can be determined with high accuracy using ML algorithms and metamerism can be prevented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.