ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Suppressive effect of vitamin K
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Organoids to Unlock the Potential of Human Torpor for Spaceflight.Current stem cell reports · 2026Article
- The role and therapeutic potential of vitamins in fracture healing.Nutrition journal · 2026Review
- Cervical cancer in the modern era: cutting-edge strategies for diagnosis and treatment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate whether vitamin K MATERIALS AND
methodsOur study included 34 patients who underwent whole pelvic irradiation for uterine cancer between 2001 and 2010. The patients were categorized in two groups: (1) Vitamin K
resultsRegarding change rate in the BMD of L3-L4 which was outside the irradiated field, no significant changes were observed in BMD after radiation in either groups compared to BMD before radiotherapy. Regarding change rate in BMD of L5-S1 which was inside the irradiated field, BMD reduced significantly at 6 months after radiotherapy compared to BMD before the start of radiotherapy in Group B (P = 0.0234). However, no significant change was seen in group A. Grade 2 and 3 insufficiency fractures appeared in both groups, one in each. Regarding outside the irradiation field, one patient developed compression fracture in L2 in group B, none occurred in group A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.