Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849182›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Current surgical treatment concepts for traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine with osteoporotic bone substance].

Max J Scheyerer, Klaus Schnake, Bernhard Ullrich, Ulrich Spiegl

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Max J ScheyererKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. Max.Scheyerer@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Klaus SchnakeZentrum für Wirbelsäulen- und Skoliosetherapie, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Bernhard UllrichKlinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Deutschland.
Ulrich SpieglKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Hand- & Wiederherstellungschirurgie, München Klinik Harlaching, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures are among the most frequent fracture entities in geriatric patients. They are associated with far-reaching individual and socioeconomic consequences. Adequate diagnostics and treatment are therefore essential. The osteoporotic fracture (OF) score is a central element in determining the right treatment. Although the majority of fractures can be healed with conservative treatment, a change of treatment should be considered in good time in cases of failure. Isolated cement augmentation procedures are particularly suitable for reducing pain in primarily stable osteoporotic vertebral fractures with a preserved framework structure (OF types 1-3) and a largely intact posterior edge. Dorsal cement-augmented stabilization with cementing of the fractured vertebral body leads to good results in unstable OF types 3 and 4 fractures. Dorsoventral procedures with cement-augmented internal fixator from the dorsal side and vertebral body replacement from the ventral side play a more subordinate role. Purely ventral procedures should be avoided in this patient group.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalLumbar VertebraeOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesThoracic VertebraeAgedBone CementsHumansVertebroplastyBone CementsAgedBone cementInternal fixatorsKyphoplastyOF score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.