Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849176›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for phantom limb pain- a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Fnu Chandni, Fnu Savanti, Rohit Kumar, Murk Raj, Aakash Kumar, Aashish Kumar, Sejal Kinger, Sahil Kumar, Himat Rai, Afsana Ansari Shaik and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fnu ChandniIsra University, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.
Fnu SavantiLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rohit KumarBahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Murk RajLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aakash KumarLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aashish KumarChandka Medical College, Larkana, Pakistan.
Sejal KingerGhulam Muhammad Mahar Medical college, Sukkur, Pakistan.
Sahil KumarLiaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Himat RaiChandka Medical College, Larkana, Pakistan.
Afsana Ansari ShaikMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. sohaib_asghar123@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-2030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhantom limb pain (PLP) is a neuropathic syndrome experienced by the majority of amputees. Various treatment options are available for amputees suffering from PLP including pharmacological, psychological and neuromodulation techniques. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has proven its efficacy in alleviating PLP. Hence, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS in improving pain in patients with PLP.

methodsLiterature search was carried out on 5 electronic databases from the inception of the paper till 13th August, 2024. Randomized Controlled Trials evaluating the efficacy of rTMS in patients with PLP against a control group were included in our study. The Visual Analogue Scoring (VAS) system was used to evaluate the severity of pain. Quality assessment was performed with the Cochrane bias assessment tool and data was pooled on Review manager using the Mantel-Haenszel Random-effects model.

results5 RCTs included in this paper were included and consisted of 140 participants experiencing PLP. There was a significant reduction in pain score in the rTMS group at the end of treatment when compared to the control group (P = 0.00001). A drop out sensitivity analysis significantly improved the results by reducing the heterogeneity to null (P = 0.00001). After 30 days of treatment, there was a significant difference of pain score from baseline in rTMS groups.

conclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrates the role of rTMS in significantly reducing VAS score in patients with PLP. In the future, larger clinical trials are required that evaluate the long-term efficacy profile of rTMS to establish it as a mainstay of therapy in patients with PLP.

Indexed as

Phantom LimbRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeMeta-analysisPLPrTMSSystematic reviewVAS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.