Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849169›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2025

Effectiveness of high intensity laser treatment in partial supraspinatus tendon tears: a randomised controlled trial.

Öznur Uzun, Emine Esra Bilir, Hilal Buse Arslan, Başak Şentürk, Özge Tezen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06637410 (Effectiveness of High Intensity Laser Treatment in Partial Supraspinatus Tendon Tears), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06637410 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of High Intensity Laser Treatment in Partial Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2023 to 2023Enrolled41ConditionsShoulder Pain, Supraspinatus TearArmsHigh intensity laser therapy, Ultrasound therapy, Therapeutic Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Öznur UzunAnkara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Türkiye. soznuruzuns@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-1064
Emine Esra BilirAnkara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Türkiye.
Hilal Buse ArslanAnkara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Türkiye.
Başak ŞentürkAnkara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Türkiye.
Özge TezenAnkara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common cause of rotator cuff injury is supraspinatus tendon tears (STTs). High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has recently emerged as an important conservative treatment option. This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial in patients with partial STTs to compare the effects of HILT with those of ultrasound (US) therapy. Fifty patients between the ages of 18-75, who were diagnosed with partial STT were randomised into two groups using the closed envelope method. They were blinded to group assignment. Group-1 received 3-week HILT program. Group-2 received 3-week US therapy program. HILT and US therapy were carried out by the same physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure was VAS. Secondary outcome measures were Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and supraspinatus tendon thickness (SP) by ultrasonography. Nine patients dropped out of the study leaving 41 (Group-1, n = 20; Group-2, n = 21) patients for analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups before treatment in terms of age, body mass index values, gender, affected side, smoking, comorbidities, STT, VAS and SPADI values. VAS and SPADI values ​​decreased significantly in both groups at the 4th and 12th weeks. However, VAS and SPADI values ​​at the 4th and 12th weeks were significantly lower in the HILT group than in the US group. Cohen's d analysis revealed large effect sizes at the 4th and 12th weeks favoring the HILT group. There was no significant change in SP within and between groups at any time points. The findings show that HILT is superior to US treatment in reducing pain and improving function and quality of life in the long term. Both treatment methods did not affect SP. Clinical Trials ID: NCT06637410.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyRotator Cuff InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedShoulder PainTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonographyYoung AdultHILTRotator cuffShoulder painSupraspinatusUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.