Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Effectiveness of high intensity laser treatment in partial supraspinatus tendon tears: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06637410 (Effectiveness of High Intensity Laser Treatment in Partial Supraspinatus Tendon Tears), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of High Intensity Laser Treatment in Partial Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most common cause of rotator cuff injury is supraspinatus tendon tears (STTs). High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has recently emerged as an important conservative treatment option. This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial in patients with partial STTs to compare the effects of HILT with those of ultrasound (US) therapy. Fifty patients between the ages of 18-75, who were diagnosed with partial STT were randomised into two groups using the closed envelope method. They were blinded to group assignment. Group-1 received 3-week HILT program. Group-2 received 3-week US therapy program. HILT and US therapy were carried out by the same physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure was VAS. Secondary outcome measures were Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and supraspinatus tendon thickness (SP) by ultrasonography. Nine patients dropped out of the study leaving 41 (Group-1, n = 20; Group-2, n = 21) patients for analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups before treatment in terms of age, body mass index values, gender, affected side, smoking, comorbidities, STT, VAS and SPADI values. VAS and SPADI values decreased significantly in both groups at the 4th and 12th weeks. However, VAS and SPADI values at the 4th and 12th weeks were significantly lower in the HILT group than in the US group. Cohen's d analysis revealed large effect sizes at the 4th and 12th weeks favoring the HILT group. There was no significant change in SP within and between groups at any time points. The findings show that HILT is superior to US treatment in reducing pain and improving function and quality of life in the long term. Both treatment methods did not affect SP. Clinical Trials ID: NCT06637410.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39849169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.