ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of biodiversity, physiology, and anatomical adaptations in riparian flora exposed to industrial pollution stress.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing zinc (Zn) accumulation and human health risks in vegetables grown in municipal solid waste-amended soil.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of industrial pollution stress on the physiological defense, proximate composition and morphological traits of riparian vegetation.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Assessment of iron accumulation in vegetables cultivated with excessive application of organic and inorganic fertilizers along with various water sources.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Innovative adaptation of coagulation-sedimentation-filtration process in lightly polluted urban rivers with seasonal high turbidity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metal Uptake by Birches and Scots Pines Grown on a Porcelain Landfill.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities such as industrial pollution of water bodies possess threat to floras leading to extinction and endangerment. This study investigates the impact of industrial pollution on vegetation along River Chenab and its associated drains. Rivers and channels transporting industrial effluents have been determined to be significantly contaminated. The contamination was evidenced by the acidic and alkaline nature of industrial effluents, salinity, total dissolved solids, and the sodium absorption ratio. The research revealed that the pollution in the region severely impacts the native vegetation, resulting in a marked decline in density, frequency, relative density, and relative frequency across 10 sites, including three drain sites and one non-polluted site. Four plant species, Calotropis procera, Eclipta alba, Phyla nodiflora, and Ranunculus sceleratus exhibited tolerance to pollution and were present at all sites during all seasons. Anatomical modifications, such as increased root aerenchyma and vascular bundles, enabled these plants to thrive in polluted environments. The study highlights the importance of these species in phytoremediation and their potential for use in restoring degraded ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.