ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Can robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty be applied to valgus deformity.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digitized Precision Corrective Osteotomy for Treating Knee Joint Deformities: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) in valgus knees is challenging. Optimal ligament balance, implant neutral or moderate valgus alignment are crucial but conventional instrumentations usually lead to outliers. Robotic arm assisted TKA (RATKA) advantages could answer this challenge. Objectives were to assess RATKA frontal alignment accuracy for valgus knees, rotational femoral component reliability, revision surgery rate and functional outcomes for this population.
methodsThis study is based on a continuous series of 454 RATKA. Implants were positioned according to a patient-specific alignment and postero-stabilised inserts were used. Valgus values, range of motion, KOOS and revision surgery rates were assessed at one-year postoperative. Femoral component rotation was analysed intraoperatively.
resultsMAKO navigation system confirmed valgus preoperative deformity for 34 patients. Mean postoperative valgus value was - 1.5°±1.53 (range, -5 to 1), 85% patients had a residual valgus between 0 and - 3°, 97% of patients had a difference < 3° between valgus planned and valgus measured at one year postoperatively. Mean femoral rotation was + 2.65°±1.87 (range, 0 to 6.8°) of external rotation related to posterior condylar angle. No revision surgery has been performed. Mean KOOS value at one year was 80.79. 76% of patients (n = 26) had a good (70-80) or excellent (> 80) KOOS score. Mean flexion value was 133°±12 (range, 100 to 140).
conclusionRATKA can be applicable in valgus knee, offering high precision in component positioning with very few outliers. It also facilitates component rotation positioning, providing excellent functional results and ROM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39849167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.