Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39849142›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2025

[Ageism "in the mind" as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in old age].

Eva-Marie Kessler

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eva-Marie KesslerUniversitäres Department Psychologie, MSB Medical School Berlin - Hochschule für Gesundheit und Medizin, Rüdesheimer Straße 50, 14197, Berlin, Deutschland. eva-marie.kessler@medicalschool-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article systematically analyzes suicidal ideation in old age from the perspective of traditional age-related ideas, evaluations and expectations. The synthesis of empirical evidence from different research areas provides preliminary evidence that ageism "in the mind" reduces the will to live in old age and thus represents a suicide risk for the individual. This effect is caused by a culturally deeply rooted social climate of old age, according to which life in old age tends to be seen as a phase of deficit and lack of productivity, and according to which older people tend to be expected to socially withdraw and not become a burden. If healthcare professionals are not sufficiently qualified in gerontology, they are guided in their work by this age bias, which, in the worst case, is expressed in ignorance and passivity towards suicidal crises in older people. A relevant risk factor is that in old age the ageism internalized by individuals over the course of their lives is directed against themselves. The analysis underlines a contextualist understanding of suicidal ideation beyond a widespread, oversimplistic view as an understandable reaction to "old age" or a narrow psychiatric assessment as "old age depression". At the same time, ageist tendencies in the public discourse are questioned, according to which suicidal ideation in old age is a rational phenomenon that is justified in view of the horrors of old age and is also a less serious phenomenon for the social environment. The rhetoric of assisted suicide as an act of self-determination and self-decision in favor of society is also questioned.

Indexed as

AgeismSuicidal IdeationSuicideAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleRisk FactorsAssisted suicideAttitude of health personnelPrejudiceStereotypingSuicide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.