ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2025
[Ageism "in the mind" as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in old age].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Ageism in health care and suicide risk in older adults: a challenge for public health in Latin AmericaIdadismo no âmbito da saúde e risco de suicídio em pessoas idosas: um desafio para a saúde pública na América Latina].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Assisted Suicide and Suicide Prevention: Ethical Perspectives, Attitudes and Challenges for Nurses in Long-Term Care-A Qualitative Focus Group Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article systematically analyzes suicidal ideation in old age from the perspective of traditional age-related ideas, evaluations and expectations. The synthesis of empirical evidence from different research areas provides preliminary evidence that ageism "in the mind" reduces the will to live in old age and thus represents a suicide risk for the individual. This effect is caused by a culturally deeply rooted social climate of old age, according to which life in old age tends to be seen as a phase of deficit and lack of productivity, and according to which older people tend to be expected to socially withdraw and not become a burden. If healthcare professionals are not sufficiently qualified in gerontology, they are guided in their work by this age bias, which, in the worst case, is expressed in ignorance and passivity towards suicidal crises in older people. A relevant risk factor is that in old age the ageism internalized by individuals over the course of their lives is directed against themselves. The analysis underlines a contextualist understanding of suicidal ideation beyond a widespread, oversimplistic view as an understandable reaction to "old age" or a narrow psychiatric assessment as "old age depression". At the same time, ageist tendencies in the public discourse are questioned, according to which suicidal ideation in old age is a rational phenomenon that is justified in view of the horrors of old age and is also a less serious phenomenon for the social environment. The rhetoric of assisted suicide as an act of self-determination and self-decision in favor of society is also questioned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39849142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.