ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Comparisons of neurodegenerative disease biomarkers across different biological fluids from patients with Huntington's disease.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stage-dependent tau-PET signatures in Huntington's disease revealed by [¹⁸F]PI-2620.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Sex-specific immune-brain coupling in hippocampal circuits and Alzheimer's disease vulnerability.Research square · 2026Article
- Salivary total tau: a clinically practical measure of tau neuropathology in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Salivary levels of amyloid beta reflect brain amyloid beta burden in cognitively-normal older adults.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Advancing Clinical Use of Neurofilament Light Chain: Translational Insights From Research to Routine Practice.Biomarker insights · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid biomarkers play important roles in many aspects of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Huntington's disease (HD). However, a main question relates to how well levels of biomarkers measured in CSF are correlated with those measured in peripheral fluids, such as blood or saliva. In this study, we quantified levels of four neurodegenerative disease-related proteins, neurofilament light (NfL), total tau (t-tau), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and YKL-40 in matched CSF, plasma and saliva samples from Huntingtin (HTT) gene-positive individuals (n = 21) using electrochemiluminescence assays. In addition, salivary levels of NfL, t-tau, and GFAP were quantified from a larger cohort (n = 95). We found both positive and negative correlations in the levels of these biomarkers among different biofluids. Most notably, in contrast to the significant positive correlations observed between CSF and plasma levels for NfL and GFAP, we detected significant negative correlations between the CSF and saliva levels of NfL and GFAP. With regard to clinical measures, both plasma and CSF levels of NfL were significantly positively correlated with Total Motor Score and chorea, whereas saliva levels of NfL showed significant correlations in the opposite direction. Additional correlations between salivary biomarkers with clinical data, adjusting for age, sex and CAG repeat length, confirmed that salivary NfL was significantly negatively associated with chorea scores in manifest HD, but not premanifest (PM), individuals. In contrast, salivary t-tau was positively associated with measures of cognition in PM participants. These findings suggest that salivary levels of NfL and t-tau proteins may exemplify non-invasive biomarkers for disease symptoms at different stages of illness. Further, these findings highlight the notion that different forms of disease proteins exist in different biological fluids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.