ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Effects of surgical approach and downstaging in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a 2010-2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB) study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant Chemoradiation (nCRT) has been shown to improve survival in patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC). The objective of this study is to assess the patient characteristics associated with tumor downstaging in a large national database. Additionally, we evaluated surgical approach and change in clinical versus pathological staging as predictors of patient survival.
methodsUsing the 2010-2020 National Cancer Database, we identified 6,400 patients with clinical stage 1B to 4A EAC who received nCRT and underwent esophagectomy. Multivariable logistic models were estimated to evaluate odds of downstaging, and complete downstaging. Multivariable marginal Cox proportional-hazard models were estimated to evaluate all-cause mortality hazard.
results3285 (51%) patients downstaged (of which 292 [5% of total] completely downstaged), 2430 (38%) had no change in stage, and 685 (11%) progressed. Generally, higher covariate values such as Clinical T, Clinical N, age, and Charlson-Deyo score were associated with higher odds of downstaging and lower odds of complete downstaging. Downstaging was associated with 31% lower risk of death compared to progression (p < .001) and 17% lower risk of death compared to no change (p < .001). Regarding surgical approach, when compared with open esophagectomy (OE), robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was associated with 17% lower adjusted risk of death (p = .002) while minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was associated with a 10% decrease in adjusted risk of death (p = .009).
conclusionIn patients with EAC who underwent nCRT, pathological downstaging was associated with increased survival compared to no change or progression. Additionally, RAMIE and MIE were associated with lower risk of death compared to OE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.