ArticleScientific reports2025
Correlation between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and all-cause and cerebrovascular mortality among hypertension patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and all-cause mortality in patients post-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-to-albumin ratio predicts 30-day mortality in acute aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio as predictor for mortality in patients undergoing endoscopic intervention for variceal hemorrhage.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-to-albumin ratio mediates the association between Life's Crucial 9 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) is a novel inflammatory biomarker and correlated with the progression and clinical outcomes of many diseases. This investigation aimed to clarified the association between NPAR and mortality risk among hypertension patients. The database of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provided the patient data for hypertension. Using a restricted cubic spline (RCS), the association between the NPAR and mortality risk was investigated. In order to assess the independent risk contribution of the NPAR in all-cause and cerebrovascular mortality, weighted Cox proportional hazards models were employed. Concordance index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were employed to assess how effectively the NPAR predicted the mortality risk at different times. A total of 6,866 hypertension cases was included in this investigation. During follow-up, 2,757 (40%) patients have died, 582 (8.5%) of them from cerebrovascular disease. RCS regression analysis found a positive nonlinear correlation between NPAR and all-cause and cerebrovascular mortality of hypertension patients. High NPAR indicated higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.52-2.37) and cerebrovascular mortality (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.67-2.88) among hypertension patients, and these results remained after adjusting certain clinical parameters. The areas under the curve of for 5-year, 10-year and 15-year ROC for all-cause mortality were 0.720, 0.703 and 0.634, and those for cerebrovascular mortality were 0.705, 0.706 and 0.699, respectively. NPAR served as s a biomarker for all-cause and cerebrovascular mortality in hypertension patients. Higher NPAR indicated higher risk of all-cause and cerebrovascular mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.