ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Azygos Vein Stenosis in Frontotemporal Dementia Sagging Brain Syndrome.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low interstitial fluid in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Skull defect - Frontotemporal dementia sagging brain syndrome.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeSymptoms indistinguishable from behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) can develop in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension associated with severe brain sagging. An underlying spinal CSF leak can be identified in only a minority of these patients and the success rate of nondirected treatments, such as epidural blood patching and dural reduction surgery, is low. The disability associated with bvFTD sagging brain syndrome is high and, because of the importance of the venous system in the pathophysiology of CSF leaks in general, we have investigated the systemic venous circulation in those patients with recalcitrant symptoms. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 21 consecutive patients with bvFTD sagging brain syndrome in whom no spinal CSF leak could be found and who underwent imaging of the systemic venous circulation (MR- or CT-venography). An SIH Disability Assessment Score (SIHDAS) questionnaire was completed to assess the severity of the symptoms.
resultsThe mean age of the 3 women and 18 men was 50 years (range, 26-68 years). Seven patients were found to have venous stenosis. Endovascular stent placement of moderate to high-grade azygos vein stenosis in 3 patients resulted in prompt and remarkable improvement of symptoms in 2 patients (SIHDAS: very severe disability to no or mild disability) and mild improvement in 1 patient (SIHDAS: very severe disability to severe disability). Treatment of internal jugular vein and inferior vena cava stenosis in 2 patients each did not result in any improvement of symptoms. Endovascular (5 patients) or surgical (2 patients) interruption of multiple epidural spinal venous pathways did not result in any clinical improvement.
conclusionsThe azygos vein is the main conduit between the spinal CSF space and the systemic venous circulation and this study demonstrates that isolated azygos vein stenosis may be a cause of spinal CSF loss and sagging brain syndrome. In this study, the yield of finding a clinically important treatable venous lesion among patients with recalcitrant bvFTD sagging brain syndrome was relatively low (15%). However, high quality and safe noninvasive imaging of the systemic venous system is available, eg, MR-venography, and should be considered for those patients who have exhausted treatments for this devastating condition, focusing on the azygos system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.