Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39848730›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Psychiatry2025

Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment strategies for relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia in Finland: a population-based cohort study.

Heidi Taipale, Antti Tanskanen, Oliver Howes, Christoph U Correll, John M Kane, Jari Tiihonen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clozapine: past, present and future.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heidi TaipaleDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. Electronic address: heidi.taipale@uef.fi.
Antti TanskanenDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Population Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Oliver HowesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA; Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Berlin, Germany.
John M KaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Jari TiihonenDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Center for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm City Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best pharmacological treatment practices for relapse prevention in patients with first-episode schizophrenia are unclear. We aimed to assess different treatment strategies used before and after the first relapse, and their associations with subsequent relapse risk.

methodsIn this population-based cohort study, we enrolled individuals (aged ≤45 years) with first-episode schizophrenia who were hospitalised and subsequently relapsed between 1996 and 2014 from the nationwide Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Individuals who had not been taking antipsychotics within the year preceeding initial hospitalisation and who had a relapse within 5 years of discharge were included in the analyses. Treatment strategies were assessed during the 30 days before hospitalisation for the first relapse and 30 days after discharge and were categorised as either long-acting injectable, clozapine, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy, non-clozapine oral antipsychotic polypharmacy, and antipsychotic non-use. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of the risk of second relapse based on treatment type were analysed with Cox regression models for 2 years after the first relapse, or until death or end of data linkage (Dec 31, 2017). People with lived experience of schizophrenia were not involved in the research and writing process.

findingsBetween Jan 31, 1996 and Dec 31, 2017, 3000 individuals had their first psychosis relapse and were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 30·0 years (SD 7·6), 1069 (35·6%) of patients were women and 1931 (64·4%) men. No ethnicity data were available. 2148 (71·7%) had a second relapse within 2 years. Before first relapse, most individuals were either not using antipsychotics (n=1366 [45·5%]), or were using non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (n=973 [32·4%]). Compared with continuing the same treatment strategy used before the first relapse, switching to clozapine was associated with the lowest risk of second relapse compared with continuing any non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (aHR 0·66, 95% CI 0·49-0·89; relapse rate 73·2% with oral non-clozapine antipsychotic monotherapy continuation vs 57·1% with switch to clozapine). Switching to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic monotherapy (0·99, 0·76-1·28) was approximately as unhelpful in preventing the next relapse as switching to antipsychotic non-use (1·07, 0·80-1·42).

interpretationIn patients with first-episode schizophrenia having their first psychosis relapse despite use of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, continuation with the same antipsychotic modality or switch to another non-clozapine oral antipsychotic did not show evidence of being beneficial in relapse prevention, suggesting that clozapine should be started instead. This finding, together with existing knowledge of decreased risk of mortality associated with clozapine, challenges current treatment guidelines that recommend clozapine as a third-line treatment, resulting in treatment practices characterised by long delays to clozapine initiation.

fundingSigrid Jusélius Foundation.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaSecondary PreventionAdultClozapineCohort StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsClozapine

Identifiers

PMID39848730
PMCPMC11750763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.