ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2025
[Application of personalized three-dimensional printed customized prostheses in severe Paprosky type
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the short-term effectiveness and safety of personalized three-dimensional (3D) printed customized prostheses in severe Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 8 patients with severe Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects and met the selection criteria between January 2023 and June 2024. There were 3 males and 5 females, with an average age of 64.6 years ranged from 56 to 73 years. All primary replacement prostheses were non-cemented, including 1 ceramic-ceramic interface, 1 ceramic-polyethylene interface, and 6 metal-polyethylene interfaces. The time from the primary replacement to the revision was 4 days to 18 years. The reasons for revision were aseptic loosening in 5 cases, revision after exclusion in 2 cases, and repeated dislocation in 1 case. The preoperative Harris score was 39.5±3.7 and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 7.1±0.8. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications were recorded. The hip function was evaluated by Harris score, and the degree of pain was evaluated by VAS score. The acetabular cup abduction angle, anteversion angle, rotational center height, greater trochanter height, and femoral offset were measured on X-ray film. Results: The operation time was 95-223 minutes, with an average of 151.13 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 600-3 500 mL, with an average of 1 250.00 mL. The hospital stay was 13-20 days, with an average of 16.88 days. All 8 patients were followed up 2-12 months, with an average of 6.4 months. One patient had poor wound healing after operation, which healed well after active symptomatic treatment. One patient had lower limb intermuscular vein thrombosis, but no thrombosis was found at last follow-up. No serious complications such as aseptic loosening, infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture occurred during the follow-up. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 72.0±6.2 and the VAS score was 1.8±0.7, which were significantly different from those before operation ( Conclusion: The use of personalized 3D printed customized prostheses for the reconstruction of severe Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabular bone defects can alleviate pain and enhances hip joint function, and have good postoperative prosthesis position, without serious complications and have good safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.