ArticleBJGP open2025
Investigating the conditions in which women GPs thrive: a realist review protocol.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- De-humanising general practice leadership: shining a light on contemporary challenges.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen now make up approximately half of the GP workforce. However, many are leaving the profession. This could be because they experience higher rates of burnout, stress and anxiety, suicide, and lower rates of career progression than men. They also take on a greater load of emotional labour compared with men. Retaining this staff group is one of five priorities for future policy and research.
aimTo synthesise the available evidence on how general practice workplaces can best support women GPs to thrive at work. DESIGN &
settingWe propose to undertake a realist review, which seeks to understand why an approach may work in specific contexts. This involves building an understanding of how contextual factors affect the activation of mechanisms (that is, changes in participant reasoning or behaviours) to produce their outcomes.
methodWe will locate available evidence on the topic, and, using a realist logic of analysis, develop an understanding as to how, why, for whom, and in what contexts women GPs thrive at work. Evidence will include academic literature, policy documents, media items, and guidelines.
resultsFindings will be co-disseminated with public and patient involvement (PPI) and stakeholder members to all key groups, including policymakers, employers, the public, and academic audiences, by a wide variety of means.
conclusionThis review is intended to improve understanding of how working environments affect women GPs. It is anticipated that findings will support the implementation of strategies to better support this group to thrive at work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.