ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025
Diagnostic performance of
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlthough the burden of syphilis is slightly increasing worldwide, there are a limited number of rapid, simple-to-use, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic tools available. Thus, we aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the
methodsWe conducted a multicentre cross-sectional study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the index test against the reference test. We enrolled 581 syphilis-suspected cases from the five selected health facilities in Addis Ababa in this study. We collected data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and whole blood from each participant. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the index test.
resultsOf the 581 participants, 380 (65.4%) were female. The mean age of the participants was 39.7 years (±SD 16.6), with an age range of 18-94 years. The sensitivity of the index test was 99.4% (95% CI 96.4% to 100%), while the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value of the index test was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 99.8% (95% CI 98.4% to 100%). There was no invalid test result.
conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of TPPA for syphilis was equivalent to that of ECLIA. Thus, TPPA can be used for the diagnosis of syphilis at the health facility level equivalent to a reference test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.