Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39848638›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Applying implementation science frameworks to understand why fisherfolk continue or discontinue pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in Uganda: a qualitative analysis.

Simon Mwima, Laura M Bogart, William Musoke, Semei C Mukama, Stella Allupo, Herbert Kadama, Rose Naigino, Barbara Mukasa, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon MwimaSocial Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA smwima2@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-2026
Laura M BogartRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
William MusokeMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Semei C MukamaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella AllupoInfectious Disease Institute Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Herbert KadamaMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Rose NaiginoDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Barbara MukasaMildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Rhoda Kitti WanyenzeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Evaluation of the Implementation of PrEP Provision for Ugandan FisherfolkR34MH119924 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI BOGART, LAURA M, WANYENZE, RHODA KITTI · 2020 to 2022
$643k
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH119924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Uganda, fisherfolk have an HIV prevalence between 15% and 40%, significantly higher than the national average of 5.5%. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV but faces challenges in uptake and continuation among fisherfolk. This study explores factors influencing PrEP continuation and discontinuation among fisherfolk in Uganda using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

methodsParticipants were recruited from two fishing communities near Entebbe, Uganda. One community received enhanced PrEP support (adherence support, educational workshops and check-in calls), while the other received standard healthcare outreach. Forty fisherfolk (20 who continued PrEP and 20 who discontinued PrEP) were interviewed 6 months after initiating PrEP. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with high inter-rater consistency. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

resultsFindings highlighted several determinants of PrEP continuation and discontinuation across the CFIR domains. Intervention characteristics such as side effects and the pill burden were significant barriers, particularly for women who reported nausea and stomach issues. Individual characteristics revealed that perceived HIV risk influenced PrEP use, with women's decisions often influenced by their partners' behaviours and mobility. However, insufficient information and education, especially among women, led to misunderstandings and discontinuation. Inner-setting factors like mobility issues and the distance to healthcare clinics posed significant barriers exacerbated by the geographical isolation of fishing communities. In the outer setting, high HIV prevalence motivated PrEP initiation, but stigma, particularly the misconception that PrEP is an antiretroviral drug used by people living with HIV, led to discontinuation.

conclusionFisherfolk in Uganda encounter multiple barriers to PrEP continuation, with women facing more significant challenges. Enhanced support strategies are essential for improving PrEP adherence and informing future HIV prevention interventions in high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsMedication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUgandaYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsGlobal HealthHIVPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39848638
PMCPMC11758698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.