Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847728›Full record

ArticleInvestigative radiology2025

Gadopiclenol Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose While Maintaining Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Enhancement for Pulmonary MRA: An Opportunity for Improved Safety and Sustainability.

Julius F Heidenreich, Sheena Y Chu, Jan-Peter Grunz, Jitka Starekova, Prashant Nagpal, Scott B Reeder, Thomas M Grist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julius F HeidenreichDepartments of Radiology (J.F.H., S.Y.C., J.-P.G., J.S., P.N., S.B.R., T.M.G.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R., T.M.G.), Medical Physics (S.Y.C., S.B.R., T.M.G.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI; and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.F.H., J.-P.G.), University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-7982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesPulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.

resultsSignal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P  = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P 's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.

conclusionsThe high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaGadoliniumImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsContrast Mediagadobenic acidGadoliniumMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsgadopiclenolGBCAmagnetic resonance angiographypulmonary angiography

Identifiers

PMID39847728
PMCPMC12588655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.