ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Predictors of implant failure: A comprehensive analysis of risk factors in oral implant restoration for patients with partial defects of dentition.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of marginal bone loss around implant restored with platform switched versus platform matched abutments.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Dental Implant Failure: A Retrospective Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant failure remains a significant challenge in oral implantology, necessitating a deeper understanding of its risk factors to improve treatment outcomes. This study aimed to enhance the clinical outcomes of oral implant restoration by investigating the factors contributing to implant failure in patients with partial dentition defects within two years of treatment. Additionally, the study sought to develop an early risk prediction model for implant failure. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 300 patients with partial dentition defects, dividing them into two groups: a failed implant group and a successful implant group, based on the occurrence of implant failure within two years. General clinical data and condition-specific clinical information were compared between the groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify influencing factors, while the predictive effectiveness of the model was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The analysis revealed that factors, such as gender, post-implant smoking, oral hygiene status at the second-year follow-up, tooth position, number of implants, timing of loading, width of keratinized mucosa, and bone quantity significantly influenced the likelihood of implant failure (P < 0.05). Among these, post-implant smoking and tooth position were identified as independent risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) for tooth position was 0.695, indicating low predictive performance. Although tooth position was determined to be an independent risk factor for implant failure within two years, its predictive performance was limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.