Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847605›Full record

Trial reportPLoS biology2025

Neurofeedback and attention modulate somatosensory alpha oscillations but not pain perception.

Vanessa D Hohn, Laura Tiemann, Felix S Bott, Elisabeth S May, Clara Fritzen, Moritz M Nickel, Cristina Gil Ávila, Markus Ploner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05570695 (How do Alpha Oscillations Shape the Perception of Pain? - An EEG-based Neurofeedback Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05570695 nacompletednot on this map

How do Alpha Oscillations Shape the Perception of Pain? - An EEG-based Neurofeedback Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2022 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsExperimental Pain in Healthy Human SubjectsArmsattention right training, ARTNF, attention left training, ALTNF, sham attention right training, ARTsham, sham attention left training, ALTsham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vanessa D HohnDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Laura TiemannDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Felix S BottDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth S MayDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Clara FritzenDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Moritz M NickelDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Cristina Gil ÁvilaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Markus PlonerDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7767-7170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is closely linked to alpha oscillations (8 < 13 Hz) which are thought to represent a supra-modal, top-down mediated gating mechanism that shapes sensory processing. Consequently, alpha oscillations might also shape the cerebral processing of nociceptive input and eventually the perception of pain. To test this mechanistic hypothesis, we designed a sham-controlled and double-blind electroencephalography (EEG)-based neurofeedback study. In a short-term neurofeedback training protocol, healthy participants learned to up- and down-regulate somatosensory alpha oscillations using attention. Subsequently, we investigated how this manipulation impacts experimental pain applied during neurofeedback. Using Bayesian statistics and mediation analysis, we aimed to test whether alpha oscillations mediate attention effects on pain perception. The results showed that attention and neurofeedback successfully up- and down-regulated the asymmetry of somatosensory alpha oscillations. However, attention and neurofeedback did not modulate pain ratings or related brain responses. Accordingly, somatosensory alpha oscillations did not mediate attention effects on pain perception. Thus, our results challenge the hypothesis that somatosensory alpha oscillations shape pain perception. A causal relationship between alpha oscillations and pain perception might not exist or be more complex than hypothesized. Trial registration: Following Stage 1 acceptance, the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05570695.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmAttentionNeurofeedbackPain PerceptionSomatosensory CortexAdultBayes TheoremDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePainYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39847605
PMCPMC11756787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.