Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847582›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2025

The tumour histopathology "glossary" for AI developers.

Soham Mandal, Ann-Marie Baker, Trevor A Graham, Konstantin Bräutigam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soham MandalCentre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Ann-Marie BakerCentre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Trevor A GrahamCentre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Konstantin BräutigamCentre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-3579

Funding

Cancer Research UK DRCNPG-MAY21_100001Institute of Cancer Research's Data Science InitiativeSwiss National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) are leading to significant advances in cancer research, particularly in analysing histopathology images for prognostic and treatment-predictive insights. However, effective translation of these computational methods requires computational researchers to have at least a basic understanding of histopathology. In this work, we aim to bridge that gap by introducing essential histopathology concepts to support AI developers in their research. We cover the defining features of key cell types, including epithelial, stromal, and immune cells. The concepts of malignancy, precursor lesions, and the tumour microenvironment (TME) are discussed and illustrated. To enhance understanding, we also introduce foundational histopathology techniques, such as conventional staining with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), antibody staining by immunohistochemistry, and including the new multiplexed antibody staining methods. By providing this essential knowledge to the computational community, we aim to accelerate the development of AI algorithms for cancer research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansImmunohistochemistryTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39847582
PMCPMC11756763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.