ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Data-driven discovery and parameter estimation of mathematical models in biological pattern formation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative diffusion model surrogates for mechanistic agent-based biological models.Machine learning: science and technology · 2025Article
- Actin network heterogeneity tunes activator-inhibitor dynamics at the cell cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mathematical modeling has been utilized to explain biological pattern formation, but the selections of models and parameters have been made empirically. In the present study, we propose a data-driven approach to validate the applicability of mathematical models. Specifically, we developed methods to automatically select the appropriate mathematical models based on the patterns of interest and to estimate the model parameters. For model selection, we employed Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) for zero-shot feature extraction, mapping the given pattern images to latent space and specifying the appropriate model. For parameter estimation, we developed a novel technique that rapidly performs approximate Bayesian inference based on Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost). This method allows for parameter estimation under minimal constraints; i.e., it does not require time-series data or initial conditions and is applicable to various types of mathematical models. We tested the method with Turing patterns and demonstrated its high accuracy and correspondence to analytical features. Our strategy enables efficient validation of mathematical models using spatial patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.