Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847576›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Data-driven discovery and parameter estimation of mathematical models in biological pattern formation.

Hidekazu Hishinuma, Hisako Takigawa-Imamura, Takashi Miura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Actin network heterogeneity tunes activator-inhibitor dynamics at the cell cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hidekazu HishinumaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-4655-5317
Hisako Takigawa-ImamuraDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6355-1254
Takashi MiuraDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9465-275X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical modeling has been utilized to explain biological pattern formation, but the selections of models and parameters have been made empirically. In the present study, we propose a data-driven approach to validate the applicability of mathematical models. Specifically, we developed methods to automatically select the appropriate mathematical models based on the patterns of interest and to estimate the model parameters. For model selection, we employed Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) for zero-shot feature extraction, mapping the given pattern images to latent space and specifying the appropriate model. For parameter estimation, we developed a novel technique that rapidly performs approximate Bayesian inference based on Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost). This method allows for parameter estimation under minimal constraints; i.e., it does not require time-series data or initial conditions and is applicable to various types of mathematical models. We tested the method with Turing patterns and demonstrated its high accuracy and correspondence to analytical features. Our strategy enables efficient validation of mathematical models using spatial patterns.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPattern Recognition, AutomatedAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID39847576
PMCPMC11756800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.